Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM28549
Volume:
8 |
2 |
Feb 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
With the escalating abundance of structured and unstructured data and the rapid advancements in analytical techniques, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is catalyzing a revolution in the healthcare industry. However, as AI becomes increasingly indispensable in healthcare, concerns are mounting regarding the lack of transparency, explainability, and potential bias in model predictions. Addressing these issues, Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) emerges as a pivotal solution. XAI plays a crucial role in fostering trust among medical practitioners and AI researchers, thereby paving the way for the broader integration of AI in healthcare. This paper aims to introduce diverse interpretability techniques, shedding light on the comprehensibility and interpretability of XAI systems. These techniques, when applied judiciously, offer significant advantages in the healthcare domain. Given that medical diagnosis models directly impact human life, it is imperative to instill confidence in treating patients based on instructions from seemingly opaque models. The content of this paper includes illustrations grounded in the heart disease dataset, demonstrating how explainability techniques should be prioritized to establish trustworthiness when utilizing AI systems in healthcare.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45331
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...