Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM65954

Inventory Optimization in Manufacturing Projects Using ABC Analysis, EOQ, Reorder Point, and Just-In-Time Principles: An Automotive Industry Case Study

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM65954

Volume:

10 |

7 |

Jul 2026

Pages:

1-9

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM65954

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

GBM

Gaurav Bhandary M

Department of Mechanical Engineering

R V College of Engineering

Download Author Certificate
CR

Chandan R

Department of Mechanical Engineering

R V College of Engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate
ARP

Ananad R Pissay

Department of Mechanical Engineering

R V College of Engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate
ARG

Adarsh R Gowda

Department of Mechanical Engineering

R V College of Engineering

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

MMM

Mahantesh M Math

Department of Mechanical Engineering

R V College of Engineering

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Inventory management plays a fundamental role in balancing material availability against inventory-related costs in manufacturing operations. In the automotive industry, managing a large number of components with varying demand and procurement costs is particularly challenging, since inefficient inventory control can lead to production delays, excessive carrying costs, and poor utilization of working capital. This study presents an integrated inventory optimization framework that combines Pareto Analysis, ABC Classification, Economic Order Quantity (EOQ), Reorder Point (ROP), and Just-In-Time (JIT) principles to improve inventory control in an automotive manufacturing case study. Using inventory data comprising annual demand, unit cost, ordering cost, holding cost, lead time, and safety stock, Pareto Analysis was first applied to identify high-impact items based on annual consumption value, annual demand, and unit cost. ABC Classification was then used to establish differentiated control priorities, followed by EOQ and ROP models to determine the optimal order quantity and replenishment level. The proposed framework yielded an optimal order quantity of 1,366 units and a reorder point of 2,100 units, reducing total annual inventory cost from ₹264,000 to ₹245,440 — a saving of 7.03% — while also improving inventory visibility and replenishment planning. The results confirm that combining inventory classification with quantitative replenishment models offers a practical and scalable strategy for improving inventory performance in manufacturing organizations.

KEYWORDS

Inventory Management; Inventory Optimization; Pareto Analysis; ABC Classification; Economic Order Quantity (EOQ); Reorder Point (ROP); Just-In-Time (JIT); Automotive Manufacturing; Supply Chain Management; Lean Manufacturing.

Cite This Article

Gaurav Bhandary M, Chandan R, Ananad R Pissay, Adarsh R Gowda, Mahantesh M Math, "Inventory Optimization in Manufacturing Projects Using ABC Analysis, EOQ, Reorder Point, and Just-In-Time Principles: An Automotive Industry Case Study," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1-9, Jul 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM65954

Full Article/Conclusion

This study developed and validated an integrated inventory optimization framework combining Pareto Analysis, ABC Classification, Economic Order Quantity, Reorder Point, and Just-In-Time principles for an automotive manufacturing case study. Pareto Analysis confirmed that a small number of inventory items account for the majority of inventory investment, while ABC Classification enabled differentiated control strategies for high-, medium-, and low-priority items. The EOQ model determined an optimal order quantity of 1,366 units, and the ROP model established a replenishment level of 2,100 units, together forming an effective replenishment policy. The comparative evaluation showed that the proposed policy reduces average inventory from 1,000 to 683 units and total annual inventory cost from ₹264,000 to ₹245,440 — a 7.03% saving — despite a moderate increase in ordering cost. These findings demonstrate that integrating inventory classification with quantitative replenishment optimization yields greater benefits than applying these techniques in isolation, and that the proposed framework is readily adaptable to other manufacturing sectors where inventory investment represents a significant share of operational expenditure.

References

[1] H. H. Purba and M. Riza, "The implementation of economic order quantity for reducing inventory cost: A case study in automotive industry," in Proc. Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manage. (IEOM), Bandung, Indonesia, 2018, pp. 2545–2554. [2] S. Chopra and P. Meindl, Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation, 7th ed. Harlow, U.K.: Pearson, 2019. [3] E. Axsäter, Inventory Control, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2015. [4] M. Christopher, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 5th ed. Harlow, U.K.: Pearson Education, 2016. [5] T. Ohno, Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 1988. [6] J. Heizer, B. Render, and C. Munson, Operations Management, 13th ed. Harlow, U.K.: Pearson, 2020. [7] R. H. Ballou, Business Logistics/Supply Chain Management, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004. [8] D. Waters, Inventory Control and Management, 3rd ed. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons, 2008. [9] N. Slack, A. Brandon-Jones, and R. Johnston, Operations Management, 9th ed. Harlow, U.K.: Pearson, 2019. [10] W. J. Stevenson, Operations Management, 13th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Education, 2021.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

7/9/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

12

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...