Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65954
Volume:
10 |
7 |
Jul 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Mechanical Engineering
R V College of Engineering
Department of Mechanical Engineering
R V College of Engineering
Department of Mechanical Engineering
R V College of Engineering
Department of Mechanical Engineering
R V College of Engineering
Department of Mechanical Engineering
R V College of Engineering
Inventory management plays a fundamental role in balancing material availability against inventory-related costs in manufacturing operations. In the automotive industry, managing a large number of components with varying demand and procurement costs is particularly challenging, since inefficient inventory control can lead to production delays, excessive carrying costs, and poor utilization of working capital. This study presents an integrated inventory optimization framework that combines Pareto Analysis, ABC Classification, Economic Order Quantity (EOQ), Reorder Point (ROP), and Just-In-Time (JIT) principles to improve inventory control in an automotive manufacturing case study. Using inventory data comprising annual demand, unit cost, ordering cost, holding cost, lead time, and safety stock, Pareto Analysis was first applied to identify high-impact items based on annual consumption value, annual demand, and unit cost. ABC Classification was then used to establish differentiated control priorities, followed by EOQ and ROP models to determine the optimal order quantity and replenishment level. The proposed framework yielded an optimal order quantity of 1,366 units and a reorder point of 2,100 units, reducing total annual inventory cost from ₹264,000 to ₹245,440 — a saving of 7.03% — while also improving inventory visibility and replenishment planning. The results confirm that combining inventory classification with quantitative replenishment models offers a practical and scalable strategy for improving inventory performance in manufacturing organizations.
KEYWORDS
This study developed and validated an integrated inventory optimization framework combining Pareto Analysis, ABC Classification, Economic Order Quantity, Reorder Point, and Just-In-Time principles for an automotive manufacturing case study. Pareto Analysis confirmed that a small number of inventory items account for the majority of inventory investment, while ABC Classification enabled differentiated control strategies for high-, medium-, and low-priority items. The EOQ model determined an optimal order quantity of 1,366 units, and the ROP model established a replenishment level of 2,100 units, together forming an effective replenishment policy. The comparative evaluation showed that the proposed policy reduces average inventory from 1,000 to 683 units and total annual inventory cost from ₹264,000 to ₹245,440 — a 7.03% saving — despite a moderate increase in ordering cost. These findings demonstrate that integrating inventory classification with quantitative replenishment optimization yields greater benefits than applying these techniques in isolation, and that the proposed framework is readily adaptable to other manufacturing sectors where inventory investment represents a significant share of operational expenditure.
[1] H. H. Purba and M. Riza, "The implementation of economic order quantity for reducing inventory cost: A case study in automotive industry," in Proc. Int. Conf. Ind. Eng. Oper. Manage. (IEOM), Bandung, Indonesia, 2018, pp. 2545–2554. [2] S. Chopra and P. Meindl, Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation, 7th ed. Harlow, U.K.: Pearson, 2019. [3] E. Axsäter, Inventory Control, 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2015. [4] M. Christopher, Logistics and Supply Chain Management, 5th ed. Harlow, U.K.: Pearson Education, 2016. [5] T. Ohno, Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 1988. [6] J. Heizer, B. Render, and C. Munson, Operations Management, 13th ed. Harlow, U.K.: Pearson, 2020. [7] R. H. Ballou, Business Logistics/Supply Chain Management, 5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004. [8] D. Waters, Inventory Control and Management, 3rd ed. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley & Sons, 2008. [9] N. Slack, A. Brandon-Jones, and R. Johnston, Operations Management, 9th ed. Harlow, U.K.: Pearson, 2019. [10] W. J. Stevenson, Operations Management, 13th ed. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill Education, 2021.
Publication Date
7/9/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
12
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...