Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM55794
Volume:
10 |
1 |
Jan 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Physics
Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula, U.P
Department of Physics,
Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula, U.P
The alpha-decay properties of superheavy nuclei (SHN) offer essential insights on nuclear stability and the anticipated island of stability. This study examines the ground-state characteristics and α-decay behavior of specific superheavy isotopes utilizing the Relativistic Mean Field (RMF) framework. Binding energies, quadrupole deformation parameters, charge radii, and neutron separation energies are computed utilizing parameter sets including NL3, NL3, and DD-ME2. The α-decay energies (Qα) are derived using estimated binding energies, while the associated half-lives are assessed using empirical relations such as the Viola–Seaborg, Royer, Universal Decay Law (UDL), and Modified Brown formulae. The outcomes are juxtaposed with existing experimental data and theoretical frameworks. The research delineates areas of increased stability adjacent to anticipated shell closures and aids in comprehending the decay characteristics of superheavy nuclei. Alpha decay is the primary decay mode for numerous superheavy isotopes and acts as a crucial indicator in their experimental identification.
KEYWORDS
This study examined the alpha-decay characteristics of specific superheavy nuclei using the Relativistic Mean Field model. Ground-state characteristics, including binding energies, deformation parameters, charge radii, and two-neutron separation energies, were effectively assessed and utilized to examine nuclear stability. The findings demonstrate enhanced shell stabilization with an increasing proton number, alongside a progressive shift towards spherical nuclear configurations. The computed alpha-decay energies diminish systematically across the analyzed nuclei, resulting in a concomitant increase in alpha-decay half-lives. The uniformity among several half-life equations illustrates the dependability of the derived predictions. The nucleus ²⁹⁶120 was recognized as the most stable configuration among the chosen nuclei, demonstrating the minimal Qα value and the protracted anticipated half-life. The study validates the efficacy of the RMF technique in characterizing the structure and decay properties of superheavy nuclei. The results offer theoretical validation for increased stability around Z = 120 and aid in the pursuit of identifying the island of stability and the synthesis of novel superheavy elements.
1. Audi, G., Wapstra, A. H., & Thibault, C. (2003). The AME2003 atomic mass evaluation (II). Tables, graphs and references. Nuclear Physics A, 729(1), 337–676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.11.003 2. Bhuyan, M., Carlson, B. V., Patra, S. K., & Panda, R. N. (2011). Structural properties of superheavy nuclei. Physical Review C, 84(1), 014301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.014301 3. Brown, B. A. (1992). Simple relation for alpha decay half-lives. Physical Review C, 46(2), 811–814. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.46.811 4. Chowdhury, P. R., Basu, D. N., & Samanta, C. (2006). Alpha decay half-lives of new superheavy elements. Physical Review C, 73(1), 014612. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.73.014612 5. Delion, D. S. (2010). Theory of particle and cluster emission. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14469-3 6. Gambhir, Y. K., Ring, P., & Thimet, A. (1990). Relativistic mean field theory for finite nuclei. Annals of Physics, 198(1), 132–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(90)90330-Q 7. Meng, J., & Ring, P. (1996). Relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov description of nuclei. Physical Review Letters, 77(19), 3963–3966. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3963 8. Möller, P., Nix, J. R., Myers, W. D., & Swiatecki, W. J. (1995). Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables, 59(2), 185–381. https://doi.org/10.1006/adnd.1995.1002 9. Myers, W. D., & Swiatecki, W. J. (1966). Nuclear masses and deformations. Nuclear Physics, 81(1), 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(66)90639-0 10. Ni, D., Ren, Z., Dong, T., & Chang, G. (2008). Unified formula of alpha decay and cluster radioactivity. Physical Review C, 78(4), 044310. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.78.044310
Publication Date
6/22/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
15
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...