Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63706
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Science And Engineering
Nutan College Of Engineering And Research
Department of Computer Science And Engineering
Nutan College Of Engineering And Research
Department of Computer Science And Engineering
Nutan College Of Engineering And Research
Digital communication increasingly operates under conditions where encrypted traffic attracts forensic inspection. Traditional cryptographic techniques protect message contents but fail to conceal the existence of communication channels. InvisiCrypt addresses this gap by proposing a dual-layer security framework that fuses Advanced Encryption Standard (AES-256) cryptography with an adaptive Least Significant Bit (LSB) steganographic algorithm. Plaintext is first encrypted using AES-256 in Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) mode; the resulting ciphertext is then embedded invisibly within the pixel channels of a cover image using a complexity-adaptive LSB strategy that concentrates higher-order bit substitutions in textured image regions, exploiting the spatial masking properties of the human visual system. The stego-image is visually indistinguishable from the original, yielding a Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) exceeding 52 dB and a Structural Similarity Index Measure (SSIM) of 0.9991 at half embedding capacity. Steganalysis resistance was evaluated against histogram analysis, chi-square attack, and RS analysis, achieving detection rates of only 3.8–6.1%, near the theoretical random-chance threshold. InvisiCrypt outperforms five state-of-the-art hybrid schemes across all imperceptibility and security metrics, confirming suitability for confidential enterprise communication, digital forensics, and covert intelligence operations.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented InvisiCrypt, a dual-layer secure communication framework unifying AES-256 CBC cryptography with a complexity-adaptive LSB steganographic pipeline. Evaluation on a 200-image benchmark confirmed PSNR of 52.83 dB and SSIM of 0.9991 at 52% embedding capacity, outperforming five state-of-the-art hybrid schemes. Steganalysis detection rates of 3.8–6.1% across histogram, chi-square, and RS methods confirm that the embedded payload is statistically indistinguishable from natural image noise. The primary limitation — vulnerability to JPEG quantisation — motivates extending embedding to the DCT frequency domain for lossless-equivalent operation on JPEG carriers. Incorporating public-key encapsulation for key distribution and evaluating resistance against deep convolutional steganalysis networks are further planned enhancements. InvisiCrypt demonstrates that strong cryptography and perceptually adaptive steganography are mutually reinforcing: encryption randomises the payload into noise-like ciphertext, while adaptive embedding distributes that noise in visually complex regions where it is imperceptible — a synergy that is the core architectural principle of the framework.
[1] F. A. P. Petitcolas, R. J. Anderson, and M. G. Kuhn, “Information hiding — a survey,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 87, no. 7, pp. 1062–1078, Jul. 1999. [2] N. Provos and P. Honeyman, “Hide and seek: An introduction to steganography,” IEEE Security & Privacy, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 32–44, May–Jun. 2003. [3] G. J. Simmons, “The prisoners’ problem and the subliminal channel,” in Proc. CRYPTO 1983, LNCS, vol. 196, pp. 51–67, Springer, 1984. [4] C.-K. Chan and L. M. Cheng, “Hiding data in images by simple LSB substitution,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 469–474, Mar. 2004. [5] D.-C. Wu and W.-H. Tsai, “A steganographic method for images by pixel-value differencing,” Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 24, no. 9–10, pp. 1613–1626, Jun. 2003. [6] National Institute of Standards and Technology, “Advanced Encryption Standard (AES),” FIPS Pub. 197, Nov. 2001. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.FIPS.197 [7] B. Schneier, Applied Cryptography, 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 1996. [8] S. Bhattacharyya, I. Banerjee, and G. Sanyal, “A novel approach of data hiding using pixel mapping method,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Security, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 146–154, 2010. [9] H. Al-Dmour and A. Al-Ani, “A steganography embedding method based on edge identification and XOR coding,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 46, pp. 293–306, Mar. 2016. [10] P. Thiyagarajan, G. Aghila, and V. P. Venkatesan, “Reversible dynamic secure steganography for medical image using genetic algorithm,” IET Image Process., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 342–351, Jun. 2013. [11] B. Xu, J. Wang, T. Chen, and S. Pan, “Structural design of convolutional neural networks for steganalysis,” IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 708–712, May 2016.
Publication Date
5/22/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...