Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM10943
Volume:
5 |
11 |
Nov 2021
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Supply Chain Management
Government College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Backorders remain one of the most persistent sources of cost, customer dissatisfaction, and planner burnout in complex, multi-plant order books. This paper presents a predictive analytics framework for backorder reduction, grounded in a field program that reduced a manufacturing order book's backorder rate to 5% through a self-correcting planning cycle. We describe the baseline conditions, the predictive modeling approach, the feature set that proved most diagnostic of backorder risk, and the operational mechanisms — dashboards, exception routing, and feedback loops — that converted model output into planner action. We then generalize the approach into a reusable architecture for Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP) organizations pursuing similar maturity gains, and estimate the financial impact across freight, inventory carrying cost, penalty avoidance, and planner productivity. The paper closes with an implementation roadmap and a discussion of limitations, including data quality dependencies and organizational change management.
KEYWORDS
This paper has shown, using a program that reduced order book backorder rate to 5%, that predictive analytics converts backorder management from a reactive, uniform-attention process into a risk-ranked, self-correcting cycle. The critical elements are not only the choice of model — gradient boosting proved both accurate and interpretable enough for planner trust — but the closed feedback loop that lets the system recalibrate as conditions change, and the dashboard design that turns a probability score into a specific, root-caused action. Organizations pursuing similar S&OP maturity gains should expect the largest early returns from supplier lead-time and fill-rate features, and should plan for a multi-month ramp before the program reaches and sustains its target backorder rate.
Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning, and Operation. Pearson. Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. APICS/ASCM Body of Knowledge: Sales & Operations Planning (S&OP) Maturity Models. Institute for Supply Management. Supplier Lead-Time Variability and Risk Reporting Standards. Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. Forecasting: Principles and Practice. OTexts.
Publication Date
11/29/2021
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...