Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66712
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-18
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

PG & Research Department of Commerce
Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College (Autonomous), Chennai

PG & Research Department of Commerce
Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College (Autonomous), Chennai

PG & Research Department of Commerce
Dwaraka Doss Goverdhan Doss Vaishnav College (Autonomous), Chennai
Successful new product development and launch are among the most important yet difficult challenges an organisation encounter. New goods that are innovative, responsive to customer suggestions, regarded to be technically higher, developed within budget, and introduced before the competition provide the company a genuine competitive advantage. The idea of "Jugaad," which is based on frugal innovation, and disruptive innovation are homogeneous in that they both aim to challenge established standards in order to provide significant, scalable solutions. With an emphasis on how resource-constrained circumstances encourage creative techniques that significantly increase value for underserved consumers, this study examines the relationship between Jugaad and disruption. Based on the idea of "doing more with less for more," this study explores how Jugaad - disruptive inspired strategies might result in groundbreaking innovations that completely transform markets and business structures. This study presents a basic model of the New Product Development process that utilises the attributes of both innovation techniques through five stages. This model will give insight on how Jugaad and Disruptive innovation strategies can be availed by creating a new product which will fulfil the desired basic requirements of underserved communities in emerging countries.
KEYWORDS
Most of the big giant MNCs focus more on high-end consumers for their profitability and sustainability in the market. These organizations have, for the most part, given little attention to the people, who live in slums in Indian cities as well as smaller tier two and three towns and rural areas (Prahalad, 2009). Even while these groups' purchasing power and aspirations are modest on an individual basis, they are substantial when taken as a whole. Making basic goods and services available to these groups can greatly enhance their quality of life by raising their earning potential and improving their opportunities (Alvarez et al., 2015). This study mainly focuses on how Entrepreneurs with their innovative idea can improve the living standard of the people in underserved parts of India by developing essential products at affordable prices by synchronizing disruptive and Jugaad innovation strategies. Jugaad is rooted in Indian ethos, emphasising improvisation and solving specific-time needs of the customers, while disruptive innovation focuses on developing accessible solutions by displacing the existing players and aims for long-term sustainability. Even though both innovations have different approach in their application in developing a product the integration of these have a great advantage. They will definitely pave the way for scalable technologies that tackle issues like inequality, poverty, and affordability. This combination challenges institutions to reconsider traditional resource-intensive approaches in favour of ones that emphasise effectiveness, sustainability, and wide-ranging societal impacts. Businesses may satisfy the needs of marginalised communities, promote inclusive growth, and save costs all at once by adopting this approach.
Alvarez, S. A., Barney, J. B., & Newman, A. M. B. (2015). The poverty problem and the industrialization solution. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(1), 23–37. Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A., & Van Rossum, W. (2006). Customer value propositions in business markets. Harvard Business Review, 84(3), 90–99. Anthony, S. D., & Putz, M. (2014). The industries Apple could disrupt next. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2014/02/the-industries-apple-could-disrupt-next Assink, M. (2006). Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: A conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2), 215–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/14601060610663587 Barnes, C., Blake, H., & Pinder, D. (2009). Creating and delivering your value proposition: Managing customer experience for profit. Kogan Page. Bessant, J., & Francis, D. (1997). Implementing the new product development process. Technovation, 17(4), 189–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(97)84690-1 Bhuiyan, N. (2011). A framework for successful new product development. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 4(4), 746–770. Booz, Allen, & Hamilton. (1982). New product management for the 1980’s. Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc. Bower, J. L., & Christensen, C. M. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1, 75–76. Brenner, M. S. (1994). Tracking new products: A practitioner’s guide. Research-Technology Management, 37(6), 36–40.
Publication Date
8/12/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
6
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
11
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...