Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65947
Volume:
10 |
7 |
Jul 2026
Pages:
1-8
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Computer Science & Engineering
IET, SAGE University

Department of Computer Science & Engineering
IET, SAGE University
Large language models (LLMs) have moved from research curiosities to candidate components of production systems in a remarkably short time, and manufacturing has become one of the most active testing grounds for their agentic use. This survey examines how LLMs and LLM-based agents are being applied across manufacturing functions, organizing the literature into a four-part taxonomy: knowledge access, decision support, autonomous orchestration, and human-machine interaction. Rather than cataloging systems, we analyze them critically: we compare architectural choices such as retrieval-augmented grounding, role-specialized multi-agent designs, and digital twin coupling; we examine how published systems are evaluated; and we identify where reported capabilities rest on simulation rather than plant deployment. The analysis reveals recurring structural weaknesses—hallucination in jargon-dense industrial contexts, non-deterministic behavior colliding with real-time constraints, evaluation practices that do not measure safety, and a near-total absence of shared benchmarks. We consolidate these observations into a research agenda, arguing that the field's central open problem is no longer whether language agents can reason about production tasks, but how their proposals can be verified before they act on physical equipment. This survey is intended both as a map of a fast-moving literature and as a critical foundation for research on trustworthy agent deployment on the shop floor.
KEYWORDS
Language models have given manufacturing agents something they never had: the ability to read, explain, and improvise. This survey organized the resulting literature into four categories of increasing autonomy, compared the architectural ideas that define each, and scrutinized the evidence behind reported capabilities. The pattern is consistent: knowledge access is approaching practical maturity; decision support is useful but poorly measured; autonomous orchestration is architecturally inventive and empirically thin; and interfaces are promising wherever interpretation errors cannot reach actuators. The field's frontier is therefore not greater model capability but engineered trustworthiness—grounding, verification, and evaluation infrastructure that lets an improvising agent be safely wrong. The companion challenge for the research community is to build and study reference architectures with exactly that property.
[1] A. Vaswani et al., “Attention is all you need,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2017. [2] J. Wei et al., “Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2022. [3] S. Yao et al., “ReAct: Synergizing reasoning and acting in language models,” in Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2023. [4] P. Lewis et al., “Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks,” in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2020. [5] P. Leitão, “Agent-based distributed manufacturing control: A state-of-the-art survey,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 979–991, 2009. [6] T. Wuest, D. Weimer, C. Irgens, and K.-D. Thoben, “Machine learning in manufacturing: advantages, challenges, and applications,” Production & Manufacturing Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23–45, 2016. [7] X. Xu, Y. Lu, B. Vogel-Heuser, and L. Wang, “Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0—Inception, conception and perception,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 61, pp. 530–535, 2021. [8] “A survey of emerging applications of large language models for problems in mechanics, product design, and manufacturing,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1474034624007171 * [9] “Foundation-Model-Based Agents in Industrial Automation: Purposes, Capabilities, and Open Challenges,” arXiv preprint, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2605.02592 * [10] “LLM-Powered AI Agent Systems and Their Applications in Industry,” arXiv preprint, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2505.16120 *
Publication Date
7/9/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
9
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...