Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM54371
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The amalgamation of Artificial Intelligence (AI), autonomous weapon systems (AWS), and cyber capabilities is revolutionizing contemporary combat, reshaping doctrines of command, control, and accountability. India’s defence modernization has progressively adopted these technologies to improve strategic deterrence and operational efficacy. Nonetheless, this swift acceptance has surpassed the evolution of appropriate legal and institutional protections. The lack of legal acknowledgement of AI-related harm, ambiguous liability criteria, and disjointed collaboration among cybersecurity, data protection, and AI governance frameworks has resulted in a regulatory void. This article does a doctrinal and comparative review of India’s readiness to address AI-driven conflict, scrutinizing the Information Technology Act, 2000, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and pertinent to various international or foreign frameworks. India’s capacity to guarantee accountability and adherence to international humanitarian law is compromised by significant legal and regulatory inadequacies, according to the study. In order to maintain accountability, openness, and the rule of law in the era of intelligent warfare, it closes by suggesting a single legal and institutional framework that integrates cyber governance, AI ethics, and defence policy.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/24/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...