Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM47529
Volume:
9 |
5 |
May 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The Five Precepts (pañca-sīla) form the ethical foundation for lay followers in the Theravāda Buddhist tradition, guiding moral behavior and supporting the development of mindfulness and wisdom. In contemporary society, however, practicing these precepts presents new challenges due to rapidly changing cultural, social, and technological environments. This article explores how modern Theravāda laypeople interpret, apply, and sometimes struggle with the Five Precepts in their daily lives. Each precept abstaining from killing, stealing, sexual misconduct, false speech, and intoxicants is examined in the context of present-day issues such as dietary choices, digital piracy, evolving sexual norms, misinformation on social media, and the widespread acceptance of intoxicants. Through an analytical lens, the article also discusses how lay practitioners adapt these ethical guidelines according to their intentions, cultural backgrounds, and life circumstances. Flexibility in interpretation, the influence of monastic teachings, and the role of spiritual communities are considered essential in supporting ethical living in a complex world. Drawing on case studies and practical examples, the study highlights the relevance and resilience of Buddhist ethics in modern life, emphasizing that while challenges persist, the precepts continue to offer a meaningful framework for cultivating virtue, harmony, and inner peace. The article concludes by affirming the enduring value of the Five Precepts as a dynamic and adaptable moral compass for lay Theravāda practitioners navigating the complexities of contemporary society.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/4/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...