Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM58362
Volume:
10 |
3 |
Mar 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Cloud-based services continue to form the foundational fabric of modern digital infrastructures, supporting everything from enterprise systems to immersive web and AI applications. Yet as organisations scale, the incident management challenge rises sharply: distributed microservices, dynamic workloads, intricate dependencies and ever‐changing configurations combine to create failure modes that defy traditional manual processes. In this context, relying on human-driven Troubleshooting Guides (TSGs) is increasingly unsatisfactory: the sheer volume of alerts, the interwoven nature of faults, and the rapid pace of change make responsiveness slow, resolution accuracy inconsistent and operational costs unacceptable. Moreover, existing AIOps tools— while capable of anomaly detection or alert correlation—often fall short in providing end-to-end autonomous resolution, contextual reasoning and transparent decision-making. To bridge this gap, we propose DreamOps, a novel AI-driven centralised incident management framework tailored for cloud environments. Instead of treating alert generation and remediation as separate silos, DreamOps integrates intelligent perception, cognitive reasoning and deterministic execution into a cohesive pipeline. At its core, DreamOps transforms unstructured operational knowledge—such as incident logs, TSGs and domain expert playbooks—into executable workflows via large-language- model (LLM)-based reasoning agents. The system actively ingests telemetry from monitoring stacks (for example, metrics, logs and traces), applies machine-learning classifiers and anomaly detectors to prioritise and classify incidents, and then invokes LLM agents to generate context-aware mitigation plans. These plans are then validated, converted into deterministic workflows and executed— while retaining human oversight for critical decisions.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
3/27/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
9
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...