Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62823
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Keshav Memorial Institute of Technology
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Keshav Memorial Institute of Technology
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Keshav Memorial Institute of Technology
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Keshav Memorial Institute of Technology
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Keshav Memorial Institute of Technology
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into enterprise systems such as conversational agents, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) pipelines, autonomous AI agents, and document processing systems. Despite their capabilities, these systems remain vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, jailbreak attempts, sensitive data leakage, insecure tool usage, and unsafe autonomous behavior. Existing testing method-ologies are often fragmented, manual, and lack centralized observability. This paper presents the LLM Red Team Web Framework, a modular AI security testing platform designed to automate adversarial evaluation of LLM-powered systems. The framework supports multiple target types including Chat UI systems, RAG applications, agentic systems, API-based chat systems, and file upload pipelines. The platform enables users to create projects, configure target endpoints, select multiple vulnerability scanners, and execute security tests in isolated Docker-based environments. The framework provides real-time observability dashboards with live attack logs, severity visualization, Attack Success Rate (ASR), leakage metrics, and detection timing analytics. A dedi-cated findings module presents vulnerability evidence, mitigation strategies, and automated JIRA ticket creation support. Experi-mental evaluation demonstrates that the framework successfully automates adversarial testing workflows while improving visibil- ity and reproducibility of AI security assessments.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented the LLM Red Team Web Framework, a modular platform for automated AI security testing and observability. The framework supports adversarial testing across multiple target categories, including conversational AI systems, RAG pipelines, autonomous agents, and file upload systems. Real-time dashboards, live log streaming, severity classification, and findings management improve visibility and reproducibility of AI security assessments. Experimental evaluation demonstrates that the framework effectively automates red teaming workflows while providing scalable observability and mitigation support for modern AI systems. Future work includes multimodal vulnerability analysis, autonomous adversarial agents, and integration with enterprise SIEM platforms.
[1] OWASP Foundation, “OWASP Top 10 for Large Language Model Applications,” 2024. [2] S. Greshake et al., “More than you’ve asked for: A Comprehensive Analysis of Novel Prompt Injection Threats to Application-Integrated Large Language Models,” 2023. [3] OWASP, “LLM Application Security Risks,” 2024. [4] Anthropic, “AI Red Teaming Methodologies and Safety Evaluations,” 2024. [5] M. Zaharia et al., “Operational Monitoring and Observability for AI Systems,” IEEE Access, 2024. [6] D. Merkel, “Docker: Lightweight Linux Containers for Consistent Development and Deployment,” Linux Journal, 2023.
Publication Date
5/9/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...