Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM.FCE022
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Civil Engineering
FET, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru-562112, Karnataka, India
Department of Civil Engineering
FET, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru-562112, Karnataka, India
Pipe racks are indispensable structural systems in petrochemical and refinery plants, providing continuous support for extensive networks of process pipelines, utility lines, instrumentation trays, and auxiliary services. Unlike conventional building structures, pipe racks are subjected to highly complex and interacting load combinations that include gravity loads, pipe empty, operating and hydrotest loads, thermal expansion and contraction effects, frictional forces at sliding supports, concentrated anchor and guide loads from piping systems, together with environmental actions such as wind and seismic forces. Accurate assessment of these combined effects is essential to ensure structural safety, serviceability, and long-term operational reliability. This paper presents a comprehensive load impact analysis and global stability assessment of a multi-level steel pipe rack structure representative of petrochemical installations. A detailed three-dimensional analytical model is developed in STAAD.Pro, closely reflecting the actual structural configuration, member connectivity, bracing arrangement, and support conditions adopted in practice. Realistic pipe–structure interaction effects are incorporated by explicitly modelling piping-induced vertical, longitudinal, and transverse forces. Dead, live, empty, operating, hydrotest, thermal, friction, anchor, wind, and seismic loads are evaluated and applied in accordance with ASCE 7-16, AISC 360-16, and relevant industry guidelines. Structural performance is assessed through critical strength and serviceability load combinations, focusing on member forces, utilization ratios, lateral displacements, inter-storey drift, and overall stability behaviour. The analysis results demonstrate that seismic actions in combination with piping-induced thermal, friction, and anchor forces govern the design of key structural members and control global stability response. The study highlights the necessity of integrated three-dimensional load modelling for pipe rack structures and provides a practical, industry-oriented methodology for achieving safe, stable, and economical design of steel pipe racks in petrochemical plants.
KEYWORDS
This study presents a comprehensive load impact analysis and global stability assessment of a multi‑level steel pipe rack structure representative of petrochemical plant installations. The analysis confirms that pipe rack behaviour is governed by a complex interaction of gravity loads, piping‑induced forces, and seismic actions, rather than by conventional building load effects alone. Unlike typical building structures, operational pipe loads, thermal expansion, frictional forces at supports, and concentrated anchor forces play a decisive role in governing member forces and overall structural response. The results of response spectrum analysis establish that seismic loading governs global stability and lateral response of the pipe rack system. The structure satisfies ASCE 7‑16 minimum base shear requirements, with adequate modal mass participation exceeding 90% in both longitudinal and transverse directions. Maximum roof‑level displacements and inter‑storey drift ratios remain well within prescribed serviceability limits, confirming satisfactory lateral stiffness and stability performance under seismic excitation. Member‑level analysis highlights that beam elements are predominantly controlled by piping‑induced thermal and friction forces, while columns are governed by combined axial force and bending under seismic load combinations. Bracing members primarily resist axial forces and contribute significantly to controlling lateral deformation. Utilization ratios obtained from AISC 360‑16 design checks indicate that all structural members perform within acceptable limits, with maximum utilization ratios remaining below unity, thereby ensuring adequate strength and safety margins. The study clearly demonstrates the importance of realistic three‑dimensional modelling and integrated load consideration, particularly the inclusion of pipe–structure interaction effects, in accurately predicting force demand and deformation patterns in pipe rack structures. Neglecting thermal, friction, and anchor forces can lead to significant underestimation of design actions and potentially unsafe designs. Overall, the adopted methodology provides a practical and industry‑oriented framework for the safe, stable, and economical design of steel pipe racks in petrochemical plants. The findings of this study offer valuable guidance to practicing engineers by highlighting governing load mechanisms, critical response parameters, and the necessity of comprehensive load modelling, thereby contributing to improved reliability and performance of industrial pipe rack structures.
1. Drake, R. M., and Walter, L. A. Steel Pipe Racks: Design and Analysis. McGraw‑Hill Professional, New York, 2009. 2. ASCE 7‑16. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, Virginia, 2016. 3. AISC 360‑16. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), Chicago, Illinois, 2016. 4. Di Sarno, L., and Karagiannakis, G. “Seismic Fragility Assessment of Pipe Rack–Piping Systems.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 166, 2020. 5. Elghazouli, A. Y. “Seismic Response of Industrial Structures and Pipe Racks.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 109, pp. 275–294, 2015. 6. API RP 650. Recommended Practice for Seismic Design of Industrial Structures. American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, D.C., 2010. 7. Eurocode 8 (EN 1998‑1). Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance – Part 1: General Rules. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, 2004. 8. IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016. Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, India. 9. IS 800: 2007. General Construction in Steel – Code of Practice. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, India. 10. Muscat, A., Micallef, K., and Clayton, P. M. “Seismic Assessment of Pipe Rack Structures Considering Pipe–Structure Interaction.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 45, pp. 468–479, 2012.
Publication Date
6/18/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...