Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:10.55041/IJSREM.FCE022

LOAD IMPACT ANALYSIS AND STABILITY ASSESSMENT OF PIPE RACKS IN PETROCHEMICAL PLANTS

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

10.55041/IJSREM.FCE022

Volume:

10 |

6 |

Jun 2026

Pages:

1-7

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/ijsrem.FCE022

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

VA

VINEETH ADINARAYAN

Department of Civil Engineering

FET, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru-562112, Karnataka, India

Download Author Certificate

Mentors

SH

SRIKANTHA H

Department of Civil Engineering

FET, JAIN (Deemed-to-be University), Bengaluru-562112, Karnataka, India

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Pipe racks are indispensable structural systems in petrochemical and refinery plants, providing continuous support for extensive networks of process pipelines, utility lines, instrumentation trays, and auxiliary services. Unlike conventional building structures, pipe racks are subjected to highly complex and interacting load combinations that include gravity loads, pipe empty, operating and hydrotest loads, thermal expansion and contraction effects, frictional forces at sliding supports, concentrated anchor and guide loads from piping systems, together with environmental actions such as wind and seismic forces. Accurate assessment of these combined effects is essential to ensure structural safety, serviceability, and long-term operational reliability. This paper presents a comprehensive load impact analysis and global stability assessment of a multi-level steel pipe rack structure representative of petrochemical installations. A detailed three-dimensional analytical model is developed in STAAD.Pro, closely reflecting the actual structural configuration, member connectivity, bracing arrangement, and support conditions adopted in practice. Realistic pipe–structure interaction effects are incorporated by explicitly modelling piping-induced vertical, longitudinal, and transverse forces. Dead, live, empty, operating, hydrotest, thermal, friction, anchor, wind, and seismic loads are evaluated and applied in accordance with ASCE 7-16, AISC 360-16, and relevant industry guidelines. Structural performance is assessed through critical strength and serviceability load combinations, focusing on member forces, utilization ratios, lateral displacements, inter-storey drift, and overall stability behaviour. The analysis results demonstrate that seismic actions in combination with piping-induced thermal, friction, and anchor forces govern the design of key structural members and control global stability response. The study highlights the necessity of integrated three-dimensional load modelling for pipe rack structures and provides a practical, industry-oriented methodology for achieving safe, stable, and economical design of steel pipe racks in petrochemical plants.

KEYWORDS

Pipe racks; Petrochemical plants; Load impact analysis; Stability assessment; Pipe–structure interaction; Seismic analysis; STAAD.Pro

Cite This Article

VINEETH ADINARAYAN, SRIKANTHA H, "LOAD IMPACT ANALYSIS AND STABILITY ASSESSMENT OF PIPE RACKS IN PETROCHEMICAL PLANTS," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1-7, Jun 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/ijsrem.FCE022

Full Article/Conclusion

This study presents a comprehensive load impact analysis and global stability assessment of a multi‑level steel pipe rack structure representative of petrochemical plant installations. The analysis confirms that pipe rack behaviour is governed by a complex interaction of gravity loads, piping‑induced forces, and seismic actions, rather than by conventional building load effects alone. Unlike typical building structures, operational pipe loads, thermal expansion, frictional forces at supports, and concentrated anchor forces play a decisive role in governing member forces and overall structural response. The results of response spectrum analysis establish that seismic loading governs global stability and lateral response of the pipe rack system. The structure satisfies ASCE 7‑16 minimum base shear requirements, with adequate modal mass participation exceeding 90% in both longitudinal and transverse directions. Maximum roof‑level displacements and inter‑storey drift ratios remain well within prescribed serviceability limits, confirming satisfactory lateral stiffness and stability performance under seismic excitation. Member‑level analysis highlights that beam elements are predominantly controlled by piping‑induced thermal and friction forces, while columns are governed by combined axial force and bending under seismic load combinations. Bracing members primarily resist axial forces and contribute significantly to controlling lateral deformation. Utilization ratios obtained from AISC 360‑16 design checks indicate that all structural members perform within acceptable limits, with maximum utilization ratios remaining below unity, thereby ensuring adequate strength and safety margins. The study clearly demonstrates the importance of realistic three‑dimensional modelling and integrated load consideration, particularly the inclusion of pipe–structure interaction effects, in accurately predicting force demand and deformation patterns in pipe rack structures. Neglecting thermal, friction, and anchor forces can lead to significant underestimation of design actions and potentially unsafe designs. Overall, the adopted methodology provides a practical and industry‑oriented framework for the safe, stable, and economical design of steel pipe racks in petrochemical plants. The findings of this study offer valuable guidance to practicing engineers by highlighting governing load mechanisms, critical response parameters, and the necessity of comprehensive load modelling, thereby contributing to improved reliability and performance of industrial pipe rack structures.

References

1.                Drake, R. M., and Walter, L. A. Steel Pipe Racks: Design and Analysis. McGraw‑Hill Professional, New York, 2009. 2.                ASCE 7‑16. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Reston, Virginia, 2016. 3.                AISC 360‑16. Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), Chicago, Illinois, 2016. 4.                Di Sarno, L., and Karagiannakis, G. “Seismic Fragility Assessment of Pipe Rack–Piping Systems.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 166, 2020. 5.                Elghazouli, A. Y. “Seismic Response of Industrial Structures and Pipe Racks.” Journal of Constructional Steel Research, Vol. 109, pp. 275–294, 2015. 6.                API RP 650. Recommended Practice for Seismic Design of Industrial Structures. American Petroleum Institute (API), Washington, D.C., 2010. 7.                Eurocode 8 (EN 1998‑1). Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance – Part 1: General Rules. European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, 2004. 8.                IS 1893 (Part 1): 2016. Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, India. 9.                IS 800: 2007. General Construction in Steel – Code of Practice. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, India. 10.             Muscat, A., Micallef, K., and Clayton, P. M. “Seismic Assessment of Pipe Rack Structures Considering Pipe–Structure Interaction.” Engineering Structures, Vol. 45, pp. 468–479, 2012.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

6/18/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

4

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...