Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM29262
Volume:
8 |
3 |
Mar 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The paper presents a comparative case analysis of two leading banks, Axis Bank and HDFC Bank. The rising tide of Non-Performing Assets (NPAs) in the banking sector is a major threat to financial stability and economic progress. The case study uncovered severe deficiencies in risk management, credit evaluation, and regulatory compliance, which have resulted in a considerable accumulation of Non-Performing Assets. The banks’ exposure to economically sensitive sectors amplifies the impact of downturns on asset quality. The limitations in credit risk assessment underline the necessity for increased due diligence. Regulatory frameworks, such as the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, and prompt corrective action have a significant impact on NPA responses. The findings highlight the complicated interplay between internal banking practices, regulatory frameworks, and economic conditions that affect a bank’s financial performance. Addressing discovered weaknesses inside both these banks is important to the stability of India’s financial system. The implications, as indicated by rising NPAs, are felt throughout the sector, jeopardizing overall resilience. Addressing these problems is crucial for reducing systemic risks, preventing a credit crisis, and rebuilding trust in the financial industry. A better banking system is critical for India’s financial stability, economic growth, and stakeholder trust. As major private sector players, Axis Bank and HDFC Bank’s successful remediation set a precedent, emphasizing the need for excellent risk management, regulatory compliance, and strategic adaptation.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45365
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...