Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM20269
Volume:
7 |
6 |
Jun 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This study compares the performance of three machine learning models, XGBoost, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), and Decision Trees, for a specific task.Provide some quantitative results or comparisons to support the claim that ANN performs the best among the three models. We also present a detailed analysis of the models, their strengths and weaknesses, and the factors that contribute to their performance. Our study contributes to the growing literature on machine learning and highlights the importance of selecting the appropriate model for a given task. Based on the comparison of XGBoost, ANN, and Decision Tree models, it was found that the ANN model has out performance in the prediction task. The ANN model demonstrated a higher accuracy score and lower root mean squared error (MSE) compared to the other models. This indicates that the ANN model is more capable of accurately predicting the target variable compared to the other models. In addition to the comparison of the models, the study also explored the importance of feature selection and hyperparameter tuning in improving the performance of the models. The results showed that selecting relevant features and optimizing hyperparameters can significantly enhance the performance of the models. Overall, the study highlights the potential of using ANN models in predictive tasks and emphasizes the importance of careful feature selection and hyperparameter tuning to achieve optimal performance
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
9/5/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...