Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM55039
Volume:
9 |
12 |
Dec 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Surface roughness is a key indicator of printed‐part quality in fused‐deposition modeling (FDM) and is strongly influenced by geometric and thermal process parameters. This study investigates the predictive behavior of surface roughness using a multi-parameter dataset consisting of layer height, wall thickness, infill density, infill pattern, nozzle temperature, bed temperature, print speed, material type, and fan speed. Categorical parameters were label-encoded and fed into four machine-learning models: Generalized Linear Model (GLM), Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM), Deep Learning (MLP), and a Stacked Ensemble combining GBM and MLP with GLM as the metalearner. All models were trained directly on raw data without normalization to preserve parameter scale effects. Layer height and nozzle temperature emerged as the most influential parameters, contributing over 85% of total predictive importance. Model comparison showed that GLM achieved the highest accuracy (R² = 0.789), producing stable predictions with well-behaved residuals, while nonlinear models underperformed on unscaled features. Diagnostic results confirmed that surface roughness is governed mainly by geometric resolution and melt-flow behavior. The findings provide a robust, data-driven understanding of roughness formation and offer a reliable prediction framework for optimizing FDM print settings.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/23/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...