Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM36479
Volume:
8 |
7 |
Jul 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Road accidents remain a leading cause of death, disability, and hospitalization nationwide, underscoring the critical need for effective traffic accident risk prediction to save lives. Various models, from traditional statistical methods to modern machine learning approaches, have been proposed for this purpose. This study compares these models to identify effective strategies for predicting traffic accident risks. Given that drivers bear responsibility on the road, the research aims to provide predictive insights based on factors drivers can anticipate, such as vehicle type, age, gender, time of day, weather conditions, and more. Models like Random Forest, Logistic Regression, and Optimal Classification Trees are explored, aiming for intuitive outcomes beneficial to drivers. Additionally, geo-location data analysis using K-means clustering offers insights into high-accident areas. As the number of vehicles increases, managing road design and traffic becomes more challenging. Globally, road accidents pose significant concerns due to their profound impact on safety, health, and well-being. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that 1.35 million people die annually in road accidents, driving extensive research into advanced methodologies and algorithms for prediction and analysis. While external factors contribute to many accidents, driver-related factors also play a crucial role. Adverse weather conditions, such as rain, clouds, and fog, often impair visibility and increase accident risks. The current predictive model evaluates several potential causal factors in this context.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/13/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...