Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM62427

MAINTENANCE RIGHTS OF WOMEN IN INDIA: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF LEGAL PROVISIONS AND JUDICIAL TRENDS

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM62427

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1--

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM62427

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Mr. A. Adhil Ahamed

Mr. A. Adhil Ahamed

Department of Legal Studies, School of Law

Vels Institute of Science Technology and Advanced Studies (VISTAS)

Download Author Certificate
MNM

Mr. N. Megavannan

Department of Legal Studies, School of Law

Vels Institute of Science Technology and Advanced Studies (VISTAS)

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Maintenance law in India sits at the crossroads of constitutional guarantee and socio - economic reality. Designed to shield women from financial destitution occasioned by marital breakdown, separation, or desertion, the statutory architecture of maintenance spans a range of secular and personal-law instruments from the criminal-procedure mechanism now codified in Section 144 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 to the Hindu marriage and adoption statutes, and the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Constitutional anchoring in Articles 14, 15, and 21 provides the normative foundation for treating maintenance not as charitable relief, but as an enforceable entitlement tethered to human dignity. Despite this elaborate framework, a persistent gap between legislative intent and lived experience endures: proceedings are slow, quantum awards inconsistent, enforcement weak, and access to justice uneven. This article provides a critical doctrinal examination of maintenance law in India. It interrogates the concept and historical development of maintenance, maps the statutory landscape including the interplay between personal and secular laws, surveys landmark judicial decisions from Shah Bano through Danial Latifi to Rajnesh v. Neha, and identifies structural impediments to effective implementation. Drawing on a rights-based and comparative perspective, the article advances targeted reform proposals uniform quantum guidelines, time-bound disposal mandates, and stronger enforcement infrastructure aimed at converting legal entitlement into substantive economic justice for women.

KEYWORDS

EGAL PROVISIONS AND JUDICIAL TRENDS

Cite This Article

Mr. A. Adhil Ahamed, Mr. N. Megavannan, "MAINTENANCE RIGHTS OF WOMEN IN INDIA: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF LEGAL PROVISIONS AND JUDICIAL TRENDS," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1--, May 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM62427

Full Article/Conclusion

The foundational doctrinal works on maintenance in India are Mulla's Principles of Hindu Law  and Paras Diwan's Law of Marriage and Divorce. Mulla's treatment situates maintenance within classical Hindu law and traces its statutory codification through the 1955 and 1956 Acts, offering detailed exegesis of the conditions for entitlement and the judicial construction of relevant provisions. His approach is primarily exposition clarifying what the law is rather than critical evaluation of whether the law works. Diwan adopts a more reformist posture. Writing from a feminist legal theory perspective, he frames maintenance as an instrument of gender justice rather than a corollary of matrimonial status, and he emphasises the structural economic disadvantages unpaid domestic labour, limited employment opportunities, skill depreciation during years of homemaking that maintenance law must address if it is to promote substantive rather than merely formal equality. Together, these works provide the academic bedrock upon which contemporary maintenance scholarship is built.

References

[1] Law Commission of India, Report No. 252 (2015); Report No. 262 (2017). [1] Mulla, Principles of Hindu Law (LexisNexis, 22nd ed. 2018). [1] Paras Diwan, Law of Marriage and Divorce (LexisNexis, 7th ed. 2018). [1] Chaturbhuj v. Sita Bai, (2008) 2 SCC 316, ¶ 8 (India).

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/3/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

7

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...