Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM68369

MANUFACTURING AND EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF PLASTIC–SAND BRICKS USING WASTE PLASTIC

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM68369

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-6

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM68369

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

SM

Shreyash More

Department of Civil Engineering

SVERI's College of Engineering, Pandharpur

Download Author Certificate
NS

Nitin Sonavane

Department of Civil Engineering

SVERI's College of Engineering, Pandharpur

Download Co-Author Certificate
NM

Nandkishor Mande

Department of Civil Engineering

SVERI's College of Engineering, Pandharpur

Download Co-Author Certificate
AS

Adarsh Suryavanshi

Department of Civil Engineering

SVERI's College of Engineering, Pandharpur

Download Co-Author Certificate
VB

Vaibhav Bhosale

Department of Civil Engineering

SVERI's College of Engineering, Pandharpur

Download Co-Author Certificate
SH

Sahil Hingmire

Department of Civil Engineering

SVERI's College of Engineering, Pandharpur

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Plastic waste is a persistent environmental problem because most plastic products degrade very slowly and accumulate in landfills, waterways and open land. This study investigates the manufacture of plastic–sand bricks in which waste plastic bottles act as the binder and sieved crushed sand acts as the aggregate. The production route comprised collection, cleaning, drying, size reduction, batching, heating, mixing, molding, compaction, cooling for at least 24 hours and conditioning of the specimens. Three plastic-to-sand mixes by weight (1:3, 1:4 and 1:5) were prepared and compared with conventional bricks in terms of compressive strength and water absorption. The average compressive strengths were 9.72, 12.28 and 3.39 N/mm² for the 1:3, 1:4 and 1:5 mixes, against 5.10 N/mm² for the conventional brick, while the average water absorption values were 0.37%, 0.30% and 0.35%, against 3.00% for the conventional brick. The 1:4 mix (20% plastic by weight) gave both the highest strength (about 2.4 times that of the conventional brick) and the lowest water absorption (about 90% lower), whereas the 1:5 mix was weaker than the conventional brick. Fitted trend curves suggest that the optimum plastic content lies close to 20–22% by weight. The results indicate that plastic–sand bricks are promising for paving and non-load-bearing applications; however, standardized testing with replicate statistics, fire and thermal evaluation, durability assessment and environmental-safety review are required before any structural use is recommended.

KEYWORDS

Waste plastic plastic–sand bricks sustainable construction compressive strength water absorption mix proportion recycling.

Cite This Article

Shreyash More, Nitin Sonavane, Nandkishor Mande, Adarsh Suryavanshi, Vaibhav Bhosale, Sahil Hingmire, "MANUFACTURING AND EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF PLASTIC–SAND BRICKS USING WASTE PLASTIC," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-6, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM68369

Full Article/Conclusion

This study manufactured plastic–sand bricks from waste plastic bottles and crushed sand at plastic-to-sand ratios of 1:3, 1:4 and 1:5 and compared their compressive strength and water absorption with conventional bricks. The main findings are summarized below. The 1:4 mix (20% plastic) performed best, with an average compressive strength of 12.28 N/mm² and a water absorption of 0.30%. The 1:3 mix reached 9.72 N/mm² and 0.37%, and it also exceeded the conventional brick (5.10 N/mm²) in strength. The 1:5 mix, at 3.39 N/mm², was weaker than the conventional brick, showing that an insufficient binder content reduces strength. All plastic–sand mixes absorbed about 88–90% less water than the conventional brick (3.00%), and the fitted trend curves point to an optimum plastic content of about 20–22% by weight, which remains to be confirmed experimentally. Waste plastic can therefore be a viable binder for plastic–sand bricks, offering a route to reuse plastic waste in paving and non-load-bearing products. The findings are limited to the measured properties and test conditions, and further evaluation against applicable standards is required before specific building applications are recommended.

References

[1]                S. L. Mak, T. M. Y. Wu, F. W. F. Tang, J. C. H. Li, and C. W. Lai, “A Review on Utilization of Plastic Wastes in Making Construction Bricks,” IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 706, no. 1, Art. no. 012001, 2021. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/706/1/012001. [2]                P. Lamba, D. P. Kaur, S. Raj, and J. Sorout, “Recycling/reuse of plastic waste as construction material for sustainable development: A review,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 29, pp. 86156–86179, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16980-y. [3]                A. A. Rauniyar, R. K. Nakrani, S. R. Narpala, et al., “An Evaluation of the Use of Plastic Waste in the Manufacture of Plastic Bricks,” Discover Civil Eng., vol. 1, Art. no. 43, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s44290-024-00045-3. [4]                K. Yadav, A. Singh, O. N. Bhat, et al., “Transforming Waste into Innovation: A Review of Plastic Bricks as Sustainable Construction Materials,” Discover Civil Eng., vol. 1, Art. no. 38, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s44290-024-00040-8. [5]                S. Swinnerton, K. Kurtz, S. Neba Nforsoh, V. Craver, and C. Tsai, “The Manufacturing Process and Consequent Occupational Health and Environmental Risks Associated with the Use of Plastic Waste in Construction Bricks in Small-Scale Recycling Plants,” J. Cleaner Prod., vol. 477, Art. no. 143818, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143818. [6]                G. Santos, E. Esmizadeh, and M. Riahinezhad, “Recycling Construction, Renovation, and Demolition Plastic Waste: Review of the Status Quo, Challenges and Opportunities,” J. Polym. Environ., vol. 32, pp. 479–509, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s10924-023-02982-z. [7]                E. Cirino, S. Curtis, J. Wallis, T. T. Thys, J. Brown, R. Rolsky, and M. Erdle, “Assessing Benefits and Risks of Incorporating Plastic Waste in Construction Materials,” Front. Built Environ., vol. 9, 2023. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2023.1206474. [8]                V. Gupta and A. Sinha, “Application of Plastic Wastes as Construction Material for Sustainable Development: A Review,” World J. Adv. Eng. Technol. Sci., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 302–307, 2023. doi: 10.30574/wjaets.2023.8.1.0059. [9]                “Recent Trends in Utilization of Plastics Waste Composites as Construction Materials,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 271, Art. no. 121520, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121520. [10]             “Recycling Waste Thermoplastic for Energy Efficient Construction Materials: An Experimental Investigation,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 240, pp. 119–125, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.016.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/27/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

5

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...