Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM53139
Volume:
9 |
10 |
Oct 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Forecasting is a typical and crucial part for financial markets. Accurately forecasting volatility continues to be a significant and multifaceted task in financial markets, as it directly impacts option pricing, risk management strategies, and portfolio optimization decisions. Established frameworks such as the Black–Scholes model, the ARCH and GARCH families, and the Heston stochastic volatility model each provide distinct approaches to representing market variability. Their effectiveness depends on underlying assumptions regarding constant versus time-dependent volatility, computational feasibility, and their capacity to capture empirically observed phenomena such as volatility clustering, heavy-tailed distributions, and leverage effects. This paper offers a comprehensive conceptual comparison of these methodologies, delving into their mathematical structures, assessing their practical strengths and limitations, and discussing avenues for innovation. In particular, the integration of hybrid modeling techniques and machine learning–enhanced approaches is explored as a promising direction for improving the predictive accuracy and adaptability of volatility models in dynamic financial environments.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
10/19/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...