Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM39044
Volume:
8 |
11 |
Nov 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
In many real-world scenarios involving multiple participants, a fundamental tension exists between individual interests and collective well-being. While self-interested behavior may maximize short-term personal gains, mutual cooperation often produces superior outcomes for all parties. Such situations, termed social dilemmas, are highly relevant in addressing issues like resource allocation, environmental preservation, and collaborative decision-making. Traditional frameworks like Iterated Prisoner Dilemma (IPD) have been extensively used to study these dynamics. Hybrid approaches, including Reinforcement Learning (RL) and strategies like Tit- for-Tat (TFT), have demonstrated success in promoting cooperation. However, direct reciprocity strategies often falter when interactions involve intermediaries or circular dependencies. To address this limitation, we build upon the Graph-based simulation of Iterated version of Prisoner’s Dilemma (GIPD), a model that represents player interactions as a weighted directed graph. In this work, we incorporate the Edmonds-Karp algorithm, a computationally efficient implementation of the Max-Flow problem, to analyze and enhance cooperation pathways within this framework. By testing this extended model across diverse scenarios, we evaluate its effectiveness compared to traditional and graph- based strategies. Our findings reveal that integrating Edmonds- Karp into the GIPD significantly improves the ability to identify and sustain cooperative relationships, providing new insights into fostering collaboration in complex, multi-agent systems. .
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/27/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...