Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM52126
Volume:
9 |
8 |
Aug 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Concrete is the most widely used construction material, but the production of cement generates a large amount of carbon dioxide, contributing to environmental concerns. To address this issue, supplementary cementitious materials such as ground granulated blast furnace slag (GGBS) and silica fume (SF) can be used as partial replacements for cement. This study investigates the mechanical properties of M40 grade concrete with different replacement levels of GGBS and silica fume. Seven mixes were prepared, including a control mix, binary mixes with GGBS or SF, and ternary mixes with both GGBS and SF. Standard tests for compressive strength, split tensile strength, and flexural strength were conducted at 7 and 28 days. The results showed that GGBS improved long-term compressive strength but reduced early-age strength, while silica fume significantly enhanced both early and later strength. The ternary blend of 20% GGBS and 10% silica fume achieved the highest strength values, with 57 MPa compressive strength, 4.9 MPa split tensile strength, and 6.8 MPa flexural strength at 28 days. The study concludes that the combination of GGBS and silica fume in M40 concrete not only improves strength properties but also promotes sustainability by reducing cement consumption and carbon emissions.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
8/24/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...