Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68732
Volume:
10 |
11 |
Nov 2026
Pages:
1-12
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
EAST POINT COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
EAST POINT COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
EAST POINT COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
EAST POINT COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING
EAST POINT COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY
MediSentinelAI is an India-oriented progressive web application (PWA) that combines multimodal prescription ex-traction, symptom triage, medication reminders, sensory alerts, and geospatial emergency coordination. The author-reported implementation uses six role-specialized agents, an event-driven React client, service workers, IndexedDB, Gemini structured outputs, deterministic offline symptom rules, and Google Places with an OpenStreetMap fallback. In a reported 250-image evaluation, exact four-field record accuracy was 79.2%; a 180-vignette triage confusion matrix implies 91.7% accuracy and 45/45 observed critical-case recall; and Web Push succeeded in 488/500 trials (97.6%). These values supersede earlier summary percentages in the project dossier, which conflict with the supplied counts. The datasets, code, model prompts, and execution logs were not available for independent reproduction. Results are preliminary author-reported measurements and do not establish clinical effectiveness, regulatory exemption, or safe autonomous operation.
KEYWORDS
This paper describes MediSentinelAI as a reported PWA combining multimodal prescription extraction, four-tier symp-tom triage, offline red-flag matching, medication reminders, sensory alerts, and geospatial emergency coordination. The updated count-based dossier reports 79.2% exact complete-record accuracy on 250 prescription images, 91.7% triage ac-curacy with 45/45 observed critical-case recall on an assumed method mapping of 180 vignettes, and 97.6% notification success across 500 trials compared with 98.6% for the reported native FCM baseline. The PWA-native difference was 1.0 percentage point in delivery and 17.6 ms in aggregate median latency under the stated test, but the success deadline and raw logs remain unavailable. Results conflict with earlier headline summaries and are not independently verified. Future deployment requires reproducible evaluation records, verified privacy controls, and independent clinical and regulatory re-view. EHR integration using FHIR/HL7 and hospital bed-occupancy streaming remain future work.
[1] World Health Organization, Emergency Triage Assessment and Treat-ment (ETAT) Course: Manual for Participants. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2005. [2] N. Gilboy, T. Tanabe, D. Travers, and A. M. Rosenau, Emergency Severity Index (ESI): A Triage Tool for Emergency Department Care, Version 4. Rockville, MD, USA: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2012. [3] R. M. Anjana et al., “Metabolic non-communicable disease health report of India: The ICMR-INDIAB national cross-sectional study,” The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 474–489, 2023. [4] L. Masanneck et al., “Triage performance across large language models, ChatGPT, and untrained doctors in emergency medicine: Comparative study,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 26, Art. no. e53297, 2024, doi: 10.2196/53297. [5] C. Y. K. Williams, B. Y. Miao, A. E. Kornblith, and A. J. Butte, “Evaluating the use of large language models to provide clinical rec-ommendations in the emergency department,” Nature Communications, vol. 15, Art. no. 8236, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-52415-1. [6] X. Tang et al., “MedAgents: Large language models as collaborators for zero-shot medical reasoning,” in Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024, Bangkok, Thailand, 2024, pp. 599–621, doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.findings-acl.33. [7] World Health Organization, Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelli-gence for Health: WHO Guidance. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2021. [8] Google, “Structured outputs,” Gemini API Documentation. [Online]. Available: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/structured-output. Ac-cessed: Oct. 23, 2026. [9] Google, “Gemini API deprecations,” Gemini API Documentation. [On-line]. Available: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/deprecations. In-cludes Gemini 1.5 Flash shutdown information and current model routing; accessed Oct. 23, 2026. [10] World Wide Web Consortium, “Service Workers,” W3C Recommenda-tion, Nov. 2022.
Publication Date
11/5/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
2
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
10
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...