Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM65513

Membrane Fouling and the Limitations of Conventional Control in Membrane Bioreactor Wastewater Treatment: A Critical Review

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM65513

Volume:

10 |

6 |

Jun 2026

Pages:

1-6

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM65513

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

D

Dr.M.Yuvaraju

Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Anna University Regional Campus Coimbatore

Download Author Certificate
K

K.Lekha

Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering

Anna University Regional Campus Coimbatore

Download Co-Author Certificate
D

Dr.J.Preethi

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

Anna University Regional Campus Coimbatore

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Membrane bioreactors (MBRs) deliver superior effluent quality relative to conventional activated sludge processes by coupling biological treatment with membrane filtration, but membrane fouling remains the principal operational constraint limiting their wider adoption. This review synthesises mechanistic and data-driven fouling literature — resistance-in-series formulations, combined blocking-law models, and the activated sludge model (ASM) framework as adapted to MBR-specific biokinetics — alongside the parallel literature on machine-learning-based fouling prediction from operational sensor data. It then examines why the static, rule-based, and proportional–integral (PI) control strategies that govern the overwhelming majority of operating plants are structurally unable to anticipate fouling onset or compensate for fluctuating influent conditions, drawing on both international and Indian national literature. Particular attention is given to the Indian operating context, where real-time IoT-based monitoring infrastructure has matured considerably faster than the control logic needed to act on it, and where decentralised treatment plants face the most severe and least-buffered influent variability. The review concludes that the fouling-modelling and conventional-control literatures, considered together, establish a precise and well-evidenced case for advanced predictive and adaptive control as the necessary next step — a case this review deliberately frames as a problem statement, leaving the evaluation of specific predictive control technologies to dedicated subsequent treatments.

KEYWORDS

Membrane bioreactor; Membrane fouling; Resistance-in-series model; Activated sludge model; Conventional control; Wastewater treatment; Decentralised treatment

Cite This Article

Dr.M.Yuvaraju, K.Lekha, Dr.J.Preethi, "Membrane Fouling and the Limitations of Conventional Control in Membrane Bioreactor Wastewater Treatment: A Critical Review," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1-6, Jun 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM65513

Full Article/Conclusion

This review has examined membrane fouling mechanisms and their mechanistic and data-driven modelling, together with the documented limitations of the static and proportional–integral control strategies that govern the great majority of operating MBR and conventional activated sludge plants, with particular attention to the Indian national context. The central finding is one of asymmetry rather than absence: fouling science and fouling prediction are both comparatively mature, and real-time monitoring infrastructure — particularly in the Indian decentralised treatment sector — is likewise well developed, but no reviewed study closes the loop between these capabilities and an adaptive control response. This establishes a precise, evidence-based problem statement: any advanced control architecture proposed for MBR systems must be evaluated specifically against its ability to act on fouling predictions and monitoring data that already exist, rather than against any remaining deficiency in the underlying science. The comparative evaluation of specific candidate architectures capable of closing this loop is addressed in dedicated subsequent work  

References

[1]  Judd, S. The MBR Book: Principles and Applications of Membrane Bioreactors for Water and Wastewater Treatment. Elsevier, 2010. [2] Stephenson, T., Judd, S., Jefferson, B., Brindle, K. Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: an overview. Water Science and Technology, 41(10–11), 123–130, 2000. [3]  Kharraz, J., Khanzada, N., Farid, M., et al. Membrane distillation bioreactor (MDBR) for wastewater treatment, water reuse, and resource recovery: a review. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 2022. [4] Le-Clech, P., Chen, V., Fane, T.A.G. Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 284(1–2), 17–53, 2006. [5]  Al-Sayed, A., Hassan, G.K., Al-Shemy, M.T., El-gohary, F.A. Effect of organic loading rates on the performance of membrane bioreactor for wastewater treatment behaviours, fouling, and economic cost. Scientific Reports, 13, 2023. [6]  Decentralised and rule-based control practice in biological wastewater treatment — operational review context. (See also refs. [20]–[21].) [7]  RGA analysis and decentralized control for a wastewater treatment plant. Research review on multivariable control interaction in biological treatment. [8]  A Brief Review on the Resistance-in-Series Model in Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs). Membranes / PMC, 2019. [9]  Homayoonfal, M., Hajhashemi, Z., Hajheidari, M., Rezaei, F., Nadali, M.S. Modeling and simulation-assisted strategies for effective membrane-fouling mitigation during membrane bioreactor operation. Heliyon, 10, e38953, 2024. [10]  A Brief Review on the Resistance-in-Series Model in Membrane Bioreactors (MBRs). PMC, 6409801, 2019.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

6/26/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

7

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

Funding Agency: CMRG

Grant / Project ID: 250509

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...