Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68363
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Law
SRM INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Criminal liability in modern penal systems rests on the conjunction of a prohibited act (actus reus) and a blameworthy mental state (mens rea). This paper examines how that principle operates in Indian criminal law after the Indian Penal Code, 1860 was replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, which came into force on 1 July 2024. Using a doctrinal method, it traces the origin of the maxim, the vocabulary of fault used in the Sanhita, the judicial treatment of intention and knowledge in homicide, the limited field of strict liability, and the role of general exceptions in negating culpability. It argues that the Sanhita preserves the fault-based structure of the earlier Code while adding new offences, such as organised crime and mob lynching, that test the limits of that structure. It concludes that precise legislative drafting of mental elements is essential to protecting the accused.
KEYWORDS
The requirement of a guilty mind remains the organising principle of Indian criminal liability under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Sanhita keeps the graded scale of intention, knowledge and negligence, retains the general exceptions that excuse the blameless, and leaves the doctrine of strict liability to the exceptional case. Its new offences, however, test this structure and call for careful drafting and strict judicial scrutiny. If the mental element is read faithfully, the Sanhita can combine effective prevention of serious crime with the protection of the accused that a fair penal system demands.
[1] Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Act No. 45 of 2023, India. [2] Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Act No. 46 of 2023, India. [3] Indian Penal Code, 1860, Act No. 45 of 1860, India (repealed). [4] Woolmington v. DPP, [1935] A.C. 462 (H.L.). [5] G. Williams, Criminal Law: The General Part, 2nd ed. London, U.K.: Stevens & Sons, 1961. [6] R. v. Cunningham, [1957] 2 Q.B. 396 (C.C.A.). [7] R. v. Woollin, [1999] 1 A.C. 82 (H.L.). [8] Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1958 SC 465. [9] K.M. Nanavati v. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1962 SC 605. [10] Bachan Singh v. State of Punjab, (1980) 2 SCC 684.
Publication Date
10/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...