Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM39466
Volume:
8 |
12 |
Dec 2024
Pages:
1-3
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Finance
FMS-WISDOM, Banasthali Vidyapith, Jaipur
Finance
FMS-WISDOM, Banasthali Vidyapith, Jaipur
Short-seller reports on Indian listed companies are often seen as either market abuse or shareholder activism. This paper instead explores them from a governance perspective. It reviews public documents (company statements, exchange filings, regulatory communications, and press coverage) around the Hindenburg Research report on the Adani Group, Eros International (Mangrove Partners and other short sellers, from about 2015), and asks what boards, institutional investors, and regulators did once the allegations surfaced. Three things stand out. Boards with credible independent directors and effective audit processes responded with evidence-based, procedural answers, while promoter-led boards leaned on denial and legal threats. Institutional investors asked harder questions, though mostly out of public view. The regulatory response counted for as much as the allegations: slow or mixed signals prolonged the uncertainty. The paper argues that an activist short report acts as an external stress test of a firm's disclosure and oversight, and that the quality of the response matters more than whether the report turns out to be right. Suggestions are made for boards, investors and regulators.
KEYWORDS
Short-selling activism has real consequences for corporate governance in India. When institutions respond well, it can improve transparency, sharpen monitoring and prompt correction. When they respond poorly, it breeds uncertainty and reputational harm. The paper's main argument is that an activist short report is best seen as a stress test of a firm's governance, whatever its accuracy. How the board, investors and regulators respond decides whether the episode ends in better accountability or in a prolonged quarrel. The study has clear limits: it rests on public documents, a small number of episodes and interpretive coding. Later work could add interviews with directors and investors, systematic coding of a larger set of campaigns, and comparison with other markets where ownership is also concentrated.
[1] Aggarwal, R.K., Wu, G.: Stock Market Manipulations. J. Bus. 79(4), 1915–1954 (2006) [2] Brav, A., Jiang, W., Partnoy, F., Thomas, R.: Hedge Fund Activism, Corporate Governance, and Firm Performance. J. Finance 63(4), 1729–1775 (2008) [3] Diamond, D.W., Verrecchia, R.E.: Constraints on Short-Selling and Asset Price Adjustment to Private Information. J. Financ. Econ. 18(2), 277–311 (1987) [4] Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H.: Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. J. Financ. Econ. 3(4), 305–360 (1976) [5] Karpoff, J.M., Lou, X.: Short Sellers and Financial Misconduct. J. Finance 65(5), 1879–1913 (2010) [6] La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A.: Corporate Ownership Around the World. J. Finance 54(2), 471–517 (1999) [7] Spence, M.: Job Market Signaling. Q. J. Econ. 87(3), 355–374 (1973) [8] Freeman, R.E.: Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston (1984) [9] Securities and Exchange Board of India: SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, as amended [10] Government of India: The Companies Act, 2013 [11] Ebix: This House of “Cards” Seems To Have a Glaring Fake Revenue Problem – Hindenburg Research
Publication Date
12/27/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...