Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM54274
Volume:
9 |
11 |
Nov 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude are transforming teaching and learning practices worldwide. These AI systems can generate human-like text, assist in assignments, support research, and produce learning materials. The adoption of LLMs is rapidly increasing among students and teachers, offering numerous advantages such as increased efficiency, personalized learning, and improved understanding. However, LLMs also present certain challenges such as accuracy issues, misinformation, plagiarism risks, reduced creativity, and over-dependence. Thus, understanding the perceptions of both students and teachers is essential for integrating LLMs responsibly into the education system. This study examines data from 100 students and 100 teachers collected through structured questionnaires. The findings show that students commonly use LLMs for research, writing assignments, coding help, and presentations, whereas teachers primarily use them for idea generation, content development, coding assistance, and personalizing instruction. Both groups express mixed views regarding accuracy and ethical use. The study concludes that LLMs can significantly enhance education when used with proper guidelines and AI literacy. Recommendations include institutional policies, training programs, and curriculum integration. The study contributes to a balanced understanding of LLM use in academic settings.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
11/21/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...