Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66740
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-14
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Faculty of Science
Swami Vivekanand Subharti University
Faculty of Science
Swami Vivekanand Subharti University
Geopolitical instability has emerged as a critical source of uncertainty influencing global and emerging financial markets, particularly affecting hedge fund investment strategies that rely on dynamic risk management and return forecasting. This study investigates the effectiveness of mathematical forecasting models in predicting hedge fund strategy performance under conditions of geopolitical instability in Indian capital markets. Using a comprehensive dataset comprising hedge fund returns, market volatility indicators, and geopolitical risk proxies, the study applies advanced quantitative techniques, including time-series econometric models and volatility-based forecasting frameworks, to examine how hedge fund strategies respond to heightened geopolitical shocks. The empirical analysis evaluates the predictive accuracy of these models across different hedge fund strategy classifications, such as long-short equity and event-driven approaches. The findings are expected to reveal that geopolitical instability significantly alters volatility dynamics and strategy performance, while mathematical models incorporating geopolitical risk measures enhance forecasting precision. The study contributes to the growing literature on financial market uncertainty by offering an emerging-market perspective and provides practical implications for hedge fund managers, investors, and policymakers seeking to improve risk assessment and strategic decision-making in volatile geopolitical environments.
KEYWORDS
This study examines the influence of geopolitical instability on market volatility, forecasting performance, and hedge fund strategy behaviour in Indian capital markets using a comprehensive econometric and hybrid modelling framework. The findings provide strong evidence that geopolitical risk is a significant determinant of financial market dynamics, particularly in emerging economies characterized by high sensitivity to external shocks. The empirical results confirm that increases in geopolitical risk lead to heightened market volatility and structural shifts in return behaviour. Traditional time-series models, such as ARMA–GARCH, exhibit limited predictive capability during periods of elevated geopolitical uncertainty. In contrast, models augmented with geopolitical risk indicators demonstrate improved forecasting accuracy, while hybrid models integrating econometric techniques with artificial intelligence approaches deliver the most robust performance by effectively capturing both linear and nonlinear market dynamics. The study further reveals that hedge fund strategies respond heterogeneously to geopolitical shocks. Long–short equity strategies tend to underperform during high-risk periods due to increased market instability, whereas event-driven strategies display greater adaptability and opportunity, albeit with higher risk exposure. Additionally, regime-based analysis highlights that financial markets behave differently under low and high geopolitical risk conditions, emphasizing the importance of incorporating regime sensitivity into forecasting frameworks. Overall, the study underscores the critical role of integrating geopolitical risk into financial modelling and investment strategies. It contributes to the literature by providing emerging-market evidence and highlights the growing importance of hybrid forecasting approaches. The findings offer practical implications for investors, hedge fund managers, and policymakers seeking to enhance risk management, forecasting accuracy, and strategic decision-making in increasingly uncertain global financial environments.
1. Ang, A., Chen, J., & Xing, Y. (2006). Downside risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(4), 1191–1239. 2. Engle, R. F., Ghysels, E., & Sohn, B. (2013). Stock return predictability and volatility persistence. Journal of Econometrics, 177(2), 417–428. 3. Liu, J., Chen, Z., Yinglun, Z., Chen, Y., & Huang, Y. (2024). The time-varying effects of geopolitical risk on mutual fund risk taking. PLoS ONE, 19(6), e0303766. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303766 4. Niu, Z., Wang, C., & Zhang, H. (2023). Forecasting stock market volatility with various geopolitical risk categories: New evidence from machine learning models. International Review of Financial Analysis, 89, 102738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102738 5. Salisu, A. A., Ogbonna, A. E., Lasisi, L., & Olaniran, A. (2025). Geopolitical risk and stock market volatility in emerging economies: Evidence from GARCH-MIDAS models. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 62, 101755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101755 6. Su, C. W., Huang, S. S., & Li, Z. (2023). Forecasting EUA futures volatility with geopolitical risk: Evidence from GARCH-MIDAS models. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00722-0 7. Apergis, N., & Rezitis, A. N. (2013). Hedge fund strategies and financial stability: A GARCH analysis. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 26, 124–143. 8. Baur, D. G., & Lucey, B. M. (2010). Is gold a hedge or a safe haven? An analysis of stocks, bonds and gold. Financial Review, 45(2), 217–229. 9. Beckmann, J., Berger, T., & Czudaj, R. (2015). Uncertainty and commodity returns: Time-frequency evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 61, 1–11. 10. Bremmer, I., & Keat, P. (2009). The Fat Tail: The Power of Political Knowledge for Strategic Investing. Oxford University Press.
Publication Date
8/13/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...