Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM66740

“Modelling and Forecasting Hedge Fund Strategy Performance during Geopolitical Instability: Insights from Indian Capital Markets”

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM66740

Volume:

10 |

8 |

Aug 2026

Pages:

1-14

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM66740

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Amita Chaudhary

Amita Chaudhary

Faculty of Science

Swami Vivekanand Subharti University

Download Author Certificate

Mentors

DVK

Dr Vikas Kumar

Faculty of Science

Swami Vivekanand Subharti University

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Geopolitical instability has emerged as a critical source of uncertainty influencing global and emerging financial markets, particularly affecting hedge fund investment strategies that rely on dynamic risk management and return forecasting. This study investigates the effectiveness of mathematical forecasting models in predicting hedge fund strategy performance under conditions of geopolitical instability in Indian capital markets. Using a comprehensive dataset comprising hedge fund returns, market volatility indicators, and geopolitical risk proxies, the study applies advanced quantitative techniques, including time-series econometric models and volatility-based forecasting frameworks, to examine how hedge fund strategies respond to heightened geopolitical shocks. The empirical analysis evaluates the predictive accuracy of these models across different hedge fund strategy classifications, such as long-short equity and event-driven approaches. The findings are expected to reveal that geopolitical instability significantly alters volatility dynamics and strategy performance, while mathematical models incorporating geopolitical risk measures enhance forecasting precision. The study contributes to the growing literature on financial market uncertainty by offering an emerging-market perspective and provides practical implications for hedge fund managers, investors, and policymakers seeking to improve risk assessment and strategic decision-making in volatile geopolitical environments.

KEYWORDS

Hedge Fund Strategies Geopolitical Instability Mathematical Modeling Indian Capital Markets Financial Market Volatility Geopolitical Risk Index Emerging Financial Markets

Cite This Article

Amita Chaudhary, Dr Vikas Kumar, "“Modelling and Forecasting Hedge Fund Strategy Performance during Geopolitical Instability: Insights from Indian Capital Markets”," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1-14, Aug 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM66740

Full Article/Conclusion

This study examines the influence of geopolitical instability on market volatility, forecasting performance, and hedge fund strategy behaviour in Indian capital markets using a comprehensive econometric and hybrid modelling framework. The findings provide strong evidence that geopolitical risk is a significant determinant of financial market dynamics, particularly in emerging economies characterized by high sensitivity to external shocks. The empirical results confirm that increases in geopolitical risk lead to heightened market volatility and structural shifts in return behaviour. Traditional time-series models, such as ARMA–GARCH, exhibit limited predictive capability during periods of elevated geopolitical uncertainty. In contrast, models augmented with geopolitical risk indicators demonstrate improved forecasting accuracy, while hybrid models integrating econometric techniques with artificial intelligence approaches deliver the most robust performance by effectively capturing both linear and nonlinear market dynamics. The study further reveals that hedge fund strategies respond heterogeneously to geopolitical shocks. Long–short equity strategies tend to underperform during high-risk periods due to increased market instability, whereas event-driven strategies display greater adaptability and opportunity, albeit with higher risk exposure. Additionally, regime-based analysis highlights that financial markets behave differently under low and high geopolitical risk conditions, emphasizing the importance of incorporating regime sensitivity into forecasting frameworks. Overall, the study underscores the critical role of integrating geopolitical risk into financial modelling and investment strategies. It contributes to the literature by providing emerging-market evidence and highlights the growing importance of hybrid forecasting approaches. The findings offer practical implications for investors, hedge fund managers, and policymakers seeking to enhance risk management, forecasting accuracy, and strategic decision-making in increasingly uncertain global financial environments.

References

1.                Ang, A., Chen, J., & Xing, Y. (2006). Downside risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 19(4), 1191–1239. 2.                Engle, R. F., Ghysels, E., & Sohn, B. (2013). Stock return predictability and volatility persistence. Journal of Econometrics, 177(2), 417–428. 3.                Liu, J., Chen, Z., Yinglun, Z., Chen, Y., & Huang, Y. (2024). The time-varying effects of geopolitical risk on mutual fund risk taking. PLoS ONE, 19(6), e0303766. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0303766 4.                Niu, Z., Wang, C., & Zhang, H. (2023). Forecasting stock market volatility with various geopolitical risk categories: New evidence from machine learning models. International Review of Financial Analysis, 89, 102738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102738 5.                Salisu, A. A., Ogbonna, A. E., Lasisi, L., & Olaniran, A. (2025). Geopolitical risk and stock market volatility in emerging economies: Evidence from GARCH-MIDAS models. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 62, 101755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2022.101755 6.                Su, C. W., Huang, S. S., & Li, Z. (2023). Forecasting EUA futures volatility with geopolitical risk: Evidence from GARCH-MIDAS models. Review of Managerial Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00722-0 7.                Apergis, N., & Rezitis, A. N. (2013). Hedge fund strategies and financial stability: A GARCH analysis. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 26, 124–143. 8.                Baur, D. G., & Lucey, B. M. (2010). Is gold a hedge or a safe haven? An analysis of stocks, bonds and gold. Financial Review, 45(2), 217–229. 9.                Beckmann, J., Berger, T., & Czudaj, R. (2015). Uncertainty and commodity returns: Time-frequency evidence. Journal of Banking & Finance, 61, 1–11. 10.             Bremmer, I., & Keat, P. (2009). The Fat Tail: The Power of Political Knowledge for Strategic Investing. Oxford University Press.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

8/13/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

2

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...