Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM62989

Motivational Differences Between Athletes in Individual and Team Sports: A Survey-Based Study

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM62989

Volume:

10 |

5 |

May 2026

Pages:

1-5

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM62989

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

AN

Aditya Nath

Department of Physical Education

IIMT University, Meerut

Download Author Certificate
DSK

Dr. Shubham Kumar

Department of Physical Education

IIMT University, Meerut

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Motivation is a central psychological factor that influences athletic participation, training commitment, performance quality, and persistence in sport. Athletes may be motivated by several factors, including enjoyment, personal mastery, competition, social belonging, recognition, and goal achievement. However, motivation may differ according to the type of sport in which athletes participate. This study examined motivational differences between athletes in individual sports and team sports. A survey-based comparative design was used. The sample consisted of 60 competitive athletes aged 18 to 25 years, with 30 athletes from individual sports and 30 athletes from team sports. Individual sports included activities such as tennis, swimming, and track and field, while team sports included football, basketball, and volleyball. All participants had at least two years of competitive experience. A standardized motivation questionnaire adapted from the Sport Motivation Scale was used to measure intrinsic motivation dimensions, including mastery, challenge, enjoyment, and self-determined goal setting. The results showed that athletes in individual sports reported higher motivation scores than athletes in team sports. Individual sport athletes had a mean motivation score of 4.12 with a standard deviation of 0.36, while team sport athletes had a mean score of 3.74 with a standard deviation of 0.47. An independent samples t-test indicated that the difference was statistically significant, t(58) = 3.586, p = 0.0007. These findings suggest that individual sport athletes may experience stronger intrinsic and goal-directed motivation, possibly due to higher personal accountability, autonomy, and direct feedback from performance outcomes. The study highlights the importance of understanding motivational differences across sport types. Coaches and sport psychologists should consider the unique motivational needs of athletes and design training environments that support autonomy, competence, enjoyment, and personal development. In team sports, greater attention may be needed to strengthen individual goal-setting and intrinsic motivation within the team environment.

KEYWORDS

KEYWORDS Motivation individual sports team sports sport psychology intrinsic motivation athlete behavior self-determination theory t-test competitive athletes goal setting

Cite This Article

Aditya Nath, Dr. Shubham Kumar, "Motivational Differences Between Athletes in Individual and Team Sports: A Survey-Based Study," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1-5, May 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM62989

Full Article/Conclusion

This study found a statistically significant difference in motivation levels between athletes in individual sports and athletes in team sports. Individual sport athletes reported higher motivation scores than team sport athletes, suggesting that intrinsic and goal-oriented motivation may be stronger in individual sport contexts. The findings may be explained by greater personal accountability, autonomy, direct feedback, and self-determined goal-setting in individual sports. Team sport athletes may be influenced more strongly by group dynamics, team roles, coach feedback, and shared outcomes. The study highlights the importance of sport-specific motivational strategies. Coaches and sport psychologists should support individual goals, autonomy, competence, and enjoyment in both individual and team sport environments. In team sports, personal goal-setting and role clarity may help strengthen motivation. In individual sports, social support and balanced feedback may help maintain long-term motivation and well-being.

References

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Brière, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25(4), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014805132406 Vallerand, R. J., & Losier, G. F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11(1), 142–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209908402956 Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Brière, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.17.1.35 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Vallerand, R. J. (2007). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and physical activity: A review and a look at the future. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 59–83). Wiley. Clancy, R. B., Herring, M. P., & Campbell, M. J. (2017). Motivation measures in sport: A critical review and bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00348 Amorose, A. J., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2007). Autonomy-supportive coaching and self-determined motivation in high school and college athletes: A test of self-determination theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(5), 654–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.11.003 Gagné, M., Ryan, R. M., & Bargmann, K. (2003). Autonomy support and need satisfaction in the motivation and well-being of gymnasts. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15(4), 372–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/714044203 Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.97

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

5/9/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

3

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...