Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62989
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Physical Education
IIMT University, Meerut
Department of Physical Education
IIMT University, Meerut
Motivation is a central psychological factor that influences athletic participation, training commitment, performance quality, and persistence in sport. Athletes may be motivated by several factors, including enjoyment, personal mastery, competition, social belonging, recognition, and goal achievement. However, motivation may differ according to the type of sport in which athletes participate. This study examined motivational differences between athletes in individual sports and team sports. A survey-based comparative design was used. The sample consisted of 60 competitive athletes aged 18 to 25 years, with 30 athletes from individual sports and 30 athletes from team sports. Individual sports included activities such as tennis, swimming, and track and field, while team sports included football, basketball, and volleyball. All participants had at least two years of competitive experience. A standardized motivation questionnaire adapted from the Sport Motivation Scale was used to measure intrinsic motivation dimensions, including mastery, challenge, enjoyment, and self-determined goal setting. The results showed that athletes in individual sports reported higher motivation scores than athletes in team sports. Individual sport athletes had a mean motivation score of 4.12 with a standard deviation of 0.36, while team sport athletes had a mean score of 3.74 with a standard deviation of 0.47. An independent samples t-test indicated that the difference was statistically significant, t(58) = 3.586, p = 0.0007. These findings suggest that individual sport athletes may experience stronger intrinsic and goal-directed motivation, possibly due to higher personal accountability, autonomy, and direct feedback from performance outcomes. The study highlights the importance of understanding motivational differences across sport types. Coaches and sport psychologists should consider the unique motivational needs of athletes and design training environments that support autonomy, competence, enjoyment, and personal development. In team sports, greater attention may be needed to strengthen individual goal-setting and intrinsic motivation within the team environment.
KEYWORDS
This study found a statistically significant difference in motivation levels between athletes in individual sports and athletes in team sports. Individual sport athletes reported higher motivation scores than team sport athletes, suggesting that intrinsic and goal-oriented motivation may be stronger in individual sport contexts. The findings may be explained by greater personal accountability, autonomy, direct feedback, and self-determined goal-setting in individual sports. Team sport athletes may be influenced more strongly by group dynamics, team roles, coach feedback, and shared outcomes. The study highlights the importance of sport-specific motivational strategies. Coaches and sport psychologists should support individual goals, autonomy, competence, and enjoyment in both individual and team sport environments. In team sports, personal goal-setting and role clarity may help strengthen motivation. In individual sports, social support and balanced feedback may help maintain long-term motivation and well-being.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer. Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Brière, N. M. (2001). Associations among perceived autonomy support, forms of self-regulation, and persistence: A prospective study. Motivation and Emotion, 25(4), 279–306. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014805132406 Vallerand, R. J., & Losier, G. F. (1999). An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 11(1), 142–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209908402956 Pelletier, L. G., Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., Tuson, K. M., Brière, N. M., & Blais, M. R. (1995). Toward a new measure of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation in sports: The Sport Motivation Scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 17(1), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.17.1.35 Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 Vallerand, R. J. (2007). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sport and physical activity: A review and a look at the future. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed., pp. 59–83). Wiley. Clancy, R. B., Herring, M. P., & Campbell, M. J. (2017). Motivation measures in sport: A critical review and bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00348 Amorose, A. J., & Anderson-Butcher, D. (2007). Autonomy-supportive coaching and self-determined motivation in high school and college athletes: A test of self-determination theory. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(5), 654–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2006.11.003 Gagné, M., Ryan, R. M., & Bargmann, K. (2003). Autonomy support and need satisfaction in the motivation and well-being of gymnasts. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 15(4), 372–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/714044203 Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Ntoumanis, N. (2003). A model of contextual motivation in physical education: Using constructs from self-determination and achievement goal theories to predict physical activity intentions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.97
Publication Date
5/9/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...