Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM17694
Volume:
7 |
2 |
Feb 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-3.5 are trained using data from multiple sources, such as web data, which are predominantly in English. Hence, LLMs are commonly hypothesized to exhibit significant variations in response accuracy across multiple languages. This research investigates the hypothesis that the primary language of training data impacts the accuracy of responses to multilingual prompts. The experiments are conducted to evaluate the performance of LLMs across English and several other supported and unsupported languages, with questions structured to measure accuracy quantitatively. The study has been conducted on diverse tasks that include mathematical operations, word manipulation, and linguistic analysis. The results of the experiment demonstrate a clear edge of English prompts over prompts in other languages, with an accuracy of 80% to 100% for English prompts. A significant degradation is observed in accuracy for the same prompts translated into multiple languages other than English. The research underscores the limitations of English-dominated LLM architectures in effectively handling prompts across diverse languages. The study reveals the requirement for support for multiple languages to enable equitable access to AI-powered applications throughout the world. The source code is available at github.com/Pro-GenAI/PromptLang.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/11/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...