Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67534

Multimodal Scientific Claim Verification Using Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67534

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-5

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67534

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Milan J. Raiyani

Milan J. Raiyani

Department of Computer Science and Engineering

School of Engineering and Technology, Dr. Subhash University

Download Author Certificate
Dr. Mayur M. Jani

Dr. Mayur M. Jani

Department of Information Technology

School of Engineering and Technology, Dr. Subhash University

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Scientific claim verification is essential for evidence-based scientific communication, yet decisive evidence in research papers is often distributed across prose, tables, figures, captions, equations, and page-level layout. Text-only verification can therefore retrieve relevant sentences while overlooking the visual or structural evidence needed to interpret a claim correctly. This paper proposes a layout-aware multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework for verifying complex scientific claims from complete research PDFs. The proposed pipeline preserves document structure, extracts and links textual, tabular, and visual evidence, performs hybrid lexical-semantic retrieval with metadata and visual signals, and applies staged cross-modal reasoning using Large Language Models (LLMs) and Vision-Language Models (VLMs). Each verification output is designed to contain a decision—Supported, Refuted, or Not Enough Evidence—together with traceable source-page references and uncertainty information. A comparative literature analysis covering 30 relevant studies shows that existing work provides strong foundations for text retrieval, table reasoning, document layout understanding, multimodal verification, and hallucination control, but these capabilities remain fragmented across tasks and benchmarks. The proposed Phase-I work therefore focuses on an integrated architecture and a reproducible evaluation plan rather than reporting unperformed experiments. The planned evaluation will compare text-only, text-plus-table, layout-unaware multimodal, and complete layout-aware multimodal configurations using classification, evidence retrieval, citation correctness, hallucination, abstention, latency, and explainability measures.

KEYWORDS

Claim Verification Evidence Grounding Large Language Models Multimodal Retrieval-Augmented Generation Scientific PDFs Table Understanding Vision-Language Models.

Cite This Article

Milan J. Raiyani, Dr. Mayur M. Jani, "Multimodal Scientific Claim Verification Using Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-5, Sep 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67534

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper presents a dissertation-stage research framework for multimodal scientific claim verification using Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation. The proposed approach extends text-centered scientific claim verification toward complete scientific PDFs by preserving layout, linking multimodal evidence units, applying hybrid retrieval, and performing staged cross-modal reasoning. The literature indicates that scientific claim verification, table reasoning, visual evidence localization, document-layout understanding, and RAG reliability are active but fragmented areas [1]-[30]. The proposed research addresses the integration gap by treating evidence provenance and uncertainty as explicit components of the verification workflow. Because this work is at Dissertation Phase-I, the manuscript deliberately reports the proposed methodology and evaluation plan rather than claiming experimental results that have not yet been obtained. Subsequent phases will implement the system, conduct controlled experiments and ablations, and report measured outcomes against the defined baselines and metrics. [11]

References

1. Wadden, D., Lin, S., Lo, K., Wang, L. L., van Zuylen, M., Cohan, A., and Hajishirzi, H., —Fact or Fiction: Verifying Scientific Claims,‖ Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 7534–7550, 2020. 2. Pradeep, R., Ma, X., Nogueira, R., and Lin, J., —Scientific Claim Verification with VerT5erini,‖ Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Health Text Mining and Information Analysis, pp. 94–103, 2021. 3. Wadden, D., Lo, K., Wang, L. L., Cohan, A., Beltagy, I., and Hajishirzi, H., —MultiVerS: Improving Scientific Claim Verification with Weak Supervision and Full-Document Context,‖ Findings of NAACL, pp. 61–76, 2022. 4. Wadden, D., Lo, K., Kuehl, B., Cohan, A., Beltagy, I., Wang, L. L., and Hajishirzi, H., —SciFact-Open: Towards Open-Domain Scientific Claim Verification,‖ Findings of EMNLP, pp. 4719–4734, 2022. 5. Lu, X., Pan, L., Liu, Q., Nakov, P., and Kan, M.-Y., —SCITAB: A Challenging Benchmark for Compositional Reasoning and Claim Verification on Scientific Tables,‖ Proceedings of EMNLP, pp. 7787–7813, 2023. 6. Akhtar, M., Subedi, N., Gupta, V., Tahmasebi, S., Cocarascu, O., and Simperl, E., —ChartCheck: Explainable Fact-Checking over Real-World Chart Images,‖ Findings of ACL, pp. 13921–13937, 2024. 7. Wang, C., Shen, Y., Kuang, Z., Cohan, A., and Zhao, Y., —SciVer: Evaluating Foundation Models for Multimodal Scientific Claim Verification,‖ Proceedings of ACL, pp. 8562–8579, 2025. 8. Lal, Y. K., Bandham, M., Hasan, M. S., Kashi, A., Koupaee, M., and Balasubramanian, N., —MuSciClaims: Multimodal Scientific Claim Verification,‖ Proceedings of IJCNLP-AACL, pp. 3285–3307, 2025. 9. Ho, X., Wu, Y.-A., Kumar, S., Xia, T. C., Boudin, F., Greiner-Petter, A., and Aizawa, A., —SciClaimEval: Cross-modal Claim Verification in Scientific Papers,‖ Proceedings of LREC, 2026. 10. Ho, X., Kumar, S., Wu, Y.-A., Boudin, F., Takasu, A., and Aizawa, A., —Table-Text Alignment: Explaining Claim Verification Against Tables in Scientific Papers,‖ Findings of EMNLP, pp. 2509–2517, 2025.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/28/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

3

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

6

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...