Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66241
Volume:
10 |
7 |
Jul 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Science and Humanities
Mother Theresa Institute of Engineering and Technology (Autonomous)
This article explores the intersection of myth, psychoanalysis, and existential philosophy through the figures of Sisyphus, Orestes, and Prometheus as interpreted by Albert Camus, Jean-Paul Sartre, and Bertrand Russell. By foregrounding the theme of alienation, the analysis examines how these mythic characters embody estrangement from divine authority, social order, and meaning itself, while simultaneously dramatizing the tension between freedom and responsibility. Drawing on psychoanalytic theory, the analysis situates existentialist notions of agency within the dynamics of repression, guilt, and the superego, highlighting the unconscious dimensions of responsibility. At the same time, the myths are read as cultural texts that reflect modern anxieties about autonomy, moral obligation, and the limits of human freedom. By placing Camus’s absurd hero, Sartre’s radical freedom, and Russell’s rational humanism in dialogue with psychoanalytic perspectives, the article argues that myth provides a symbolic framework for negotiating the paradox of human agency in conditions of alienation. Ultimately, the study demonstrates how psychoanalysis and existentialism converge in their attempt to articulate responsibility in a fractured cultural landscape.
KEYWORDS
In the end, the psychoanalytic dialogue with existential philosophy reveals that alienation is not a terminal condition but the crucible in which agency is forged. Camus’s Sisyphus, Sartre’s Orestes, and Russell’s Prometheus each dramatize the ego’s confrontation with oppressive internalized structures, whether cosmic absurdity, cultural guilt, or mechanistic helplessness, and show that liberation arises only when these tyrants are dismantled. By refusing despair, rejecting manufactured remorse, and sublimating vulnerability into creative solidarity, the individual transforms alienation into autonomy. As Russell insists, man must ‘sustain alone, a weary but unyielding Atlas, the world that his own ideals have fashioned despite the trampling march of unconscious power’ (Russell, B. 2004). This is not a call to transcend the human condition, but to embrace it: to author meaning where none is given, to build ethical responsibility in an unfeeling wilderness, and to claim freedom as the conscious act of a resilient ego. In this synthesis, psychoanalysis and existentialism converge on a shared imperative, to dismantle the tyrants within and to live as agents of human values.
Camus, A. (1991). The Myth of Sisyphus and other Essays (J. O'Brien, Trans.): Vintage Books. Freud, S. (1920/1955). Beyond the pleasure principle (Vol. 18, pp. 1–64). London: Hogarth Press. Hardwick, L. (2003). Reception Studies: Greece & Rome: New Surveys in the Classics: Oxford University Press. Raghavacharya, S. (1953). Jagame maya [Song]. On Devadasu. Vinoda Pictures, Telugu Russell, B. (1918). Mysticism and logic and other essays. Longmans, Green and Co. Russell, B. (2004). Why I am not a Christian and other essays on religion and related subjects. London: Routledge. Russell, B. (2009). A Free Man's Worship. In R. E. Egner & L. E. Denonn, The basic writings: Routledge. Sartre, J. P. (1943/1946). The Flies (S. Gilbert, Trans.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Sartre, J.P (1984) Being and Nothingness. Trans. Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Washington Square Press Sartre, J.-P. (2007). Existentialism is a Humanism (C. Macomber, Trans.): Yale University Press. Segal, R. A. (2019). Jung on myth. In J. Mills (Ed.), Jung and Philosophy (pp. 204–219). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429261763-10 Shakespeare, W. (1600/1992). Hamlet (B. A. Mowat & P. Werstine, Eds.). New York: Washington Square Press.
Publication Date
7/20/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...