Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM.ISTCESD051
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Chemistry
Sant Ramdas Arts, Commerce & Science College
Silicon has re-emerged as the leading candidate to succeed graphite as the commercial anode material for high-energy lithium-ion and solid-state batteries, owing to a theoretical specific capacity nearly ten times greater than graphite and a favorably low delithiation potential. Realizing this potential, however, requires resolving two intertwined materials problems: the extreme volumetric breathing (>300%) that silicon undergoes during lithiation/delithiation, and the chronic instability of the interface it forms with the surrounding electrolyte. This review synthesizes recent progress on both fronts from a nanoscale materials perspective. We first summarize the mechanistic origins of silicon's capacity fade—particle pulverization, continuous solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) regrowth, and loss of electrical percolation—before surveying the principal synthesis routes used to engineer nanostructured silicon (ball milling, magnesiothermic/aluminothermic reduction, chemical etching, CVD, and hydrothermal methods) and the architectures they enable (nanoparticles, nanowires, porous/hollow frameworks, and Si–carbon composites). We then examine how the interfacial problem evolves when silicon is paired with liquid electrolytes versus solid-state electrolytes (sulfide, oxide, and polymer classes), emphasizing the mechanochemical coupling between particle-scale stress and interphase chemistry that is unique to all-solid-state architectures. Finally, we discuss emerging interface-engineering strategies—artificial SEI layers, conformal coatings, stress-accommodating binders and electrolytes, and stack-pressure management—alongside operando characterization approaches, and outline the remaining barriers to commercial deployment of silicon-based anodes in next-generation energy storage systems.
KEYWORDS
Nanostructuring has transformed silicon from a theoretically attractive but practically unworkable anode material into a leading candidate for next-generation lithium-ion and solid-state batteries. By controlling particle size, morphology, and composite architecture, researchers have substantially mitigated the mechanical degradation caused by silicon's large volumetric expansion. Yet the interfacial problem—the instability of the SEI in liquid electrolytes and the combined chemical and mechanical fragility of the electrode–electrolyte contact in solid-state systems—remains the central obstacle to commercialization. Progress will depend on continued integration across three fronts: scalable and sustainable nanoparticle synthesis, chemically tailored and mechanically resilient interphases suited to each electrolyte class, and cell-level engineering (stack pressure, electrode architecture, prelithiation) that connects particle-scale materials design to practical device performance. The convergence of these fronts, informed by increasingly sophisticated operando characterization and multiphysics modeling, positions nanoscale silicon anodes as a realistic near-term pathway to higher-energy-density, safer batteries.
[1] H. Nomura and K. Sato, “Cycle life improvement of lithium-ion batteries using particle size controlled silicon nanoparticle anodes,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., vol. 64, Art. no. 09SP09, 2025. [2] A. A. Pavlovskii, K. Pushnitsa, A. Kosenko, P. Novikov, and A. A. Popovich, “Nanostructured silicon anodes for lithium-ion batteries: Advances, challenges, and future prospects,” Materials, vol. 19, Art. no. 281, 2026. [3] Z. Zhang, Y. Wu, Z. Mo, X. Lei, X. Xie, X. Xue, H. Qin, and H. Jiang, “Research progress of silicon-based anode materials for lithium-ion batteries,” RSC Adv., vol. 15, no. 14, pp. 10731–10753, 2025. [4] L. Köbbing, A. Latz, and B. Horstmann, “Voltage hysteresis of silicon nanoparticles: Chemo-mechanical particle-SEI model,” Adv. Funct. Mater., vol. 34, no. 7, Art. no. 2308818, 2024. [5] X. Zuo, J. Zhu, P. Müller-Buschbaum, and Y.-J. Cheng, “Silicon based lithium-ion battery anodes: A chronicle perspective review,” Nano Energy, vol. 31, pp. 113–143, 2017. [6] M. Kim, Z. Yang, and I. Bloom, “Review—The lithiation/delithiation behavior of Si-based electrodes: A connection between electrochemistry and mechanics,” J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 168, Art. no. 010523, 2021. [7] C. Zhang, F. Wang, J. Han, S. Bai, J. Tan, J. Liu, and F. Li, “Challenges and recent progress on silicon-based anode materials for next-generation lithium-ion batteries,” Small Struct., vol. 2, Art. no. 2100009, 2021. [8] L. Sun, Y. Liu, R. Shao, J. Wu, R. Jiang, and Z. Jin, “Recent progress and future perspective on practical silicon anode-based lithium ion batteries,” Energy Storage Mater., vol. 46, pp. 482–502, 2022. [9] Y. Yang, W. Yuan, W. Kang, Y. Ye, Q. Pan, X. Zhang, Y. Ke, C. Wang, Z. Qiu, and Y. Tang, “A review on silicon nanowire-based anodes for next-generation high-performance lithium-ion batteries from a material-based perspective,” Sustain. Energy Fuels, vol. 4, pp. 1577–1594, 2020. [10] Z. Xiao, C. Wang, L. Song, Y. Zheng, and T. Long, “Research progress of nano-silicon-based materials and silicon-carbon composite anode materials for lithium-ion batteries,” J. Solid State Electrochem., vol. 26, pp. 1125–1136, 2022.
Publication Date
9/29/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...