Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM55826
Volume:
10 |
1 |
Jan 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The survey of one thousand and thirty-five (1035) students from higher education institutions of UT of Jammu and Kashmir was conducted to get feedback from students regarding performance of National educational Policy-2020 of India. The survey provides valuable insights into the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, revealing a complex landscape of student preferences and concerns. A majority of 75.4% students are satisfied with subject combinations, indicating support for multidisciplinary flexibility, while 65.4% believe subjects will enhance employability, aligning with NEP’s skill focus. However, a majority (84%) support replacing value-added courses with competitive exam prep, underscoring the emphasis on job readiness. The survey also reveals a strong preference for tech-centric skills, with 60.4% opting for AI and data analysis, whereas 30.4% prefer creative fields like fashion and design. Furthermore, 62.3% find value-added courses beneficial, but 37.5% disagree, suggesting a mismatch between curriculum design and student needs. A significant minority of 24.6% express dissatisfaction with subject combinations, highlighting the need for greater customization. Notably, 87.3% prioritize degrees for job prospects, highlighting employability concerns. To succeed, NEP-2020 must balance competing demands, address implementation challenges, and prioritize student-centricity, ensuring hassle free subject change, subject swapping, inter university migration, maintenance of academic bank of credits, transfer of credits, in India’s education system becomes more relevant, inclusive, and effective in preparing students for the future.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/30/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
9
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...