Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM30271
Volume:
8 |
4 |
Apr 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Purpose: To review the extant literature on 3PL risk management (SCRM, including risk identification, assessment, treatment, and monitoring), developing a comprehensive definition and conceptual framework; to evaluate prior theory use; and to identify future research directions. Additionally, our framework emphasizes the importance of aligning performance metrics with risk objectives, facilitating ongoing monitoring and evaluation of 3PL partnerships. By establishing clear performance benchmarks and feedback mechanisms, organizations can promptly identify emerging risks and implement corrective actions as necessary. Methodology: A systematic literature review of couple of articles (published 2000-2016) based on descriptive, thematic, and content analysis. Drawing from extensive literature review and industry best practices, our framework integrates multiple dimensions of risk identification and evaluation into a cohesive methodology. We propose a structured approach that encompasses both qualitative and quantitative techniques, enabling organizations to comprehensively assess risks across various stages of the 3PL relationship lifecycle. Through the application of our holistic framework, organizations can enhance their ability to navigate uncertainties in 3PL relationships, fostering resilience and competitiveness in today’s dynamic business environment. Findings: There has been a considerable focus on identifying risk types and proposing risk mitigation strategies. Research has emphasised organisational responses to 3PL risks. Research implications: A broad, contemporary understanding of 3PL risk management is provided; leading to a conceptual framework. The research agenda guides future work towards maturation of the discipline. Practical implications: Managers are encouraged to adopt a holistic approach to risk management. Guidance is provided on how to select appropriate risk treatment actions according to the probability and impact of a risk. Key components of our framework include risk categorization, stakeholder engagement, scenario analysis, and performance metrics alignment. By systematically categorizing risks according to their nature and impact, organizations can prioritize mitigation efforts and allocate resources effectively. Stakeholder engagement ensures that diverse perspectives are considered in the risk assessment process, enhancing its accuracy and relevance. Furthermore, scenario analysis allows for the exploration of potential future events and their implications on 3PL operations, enabling proactive risk management strategies.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45392
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...