Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM.NEP005
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Assistant Professor
Government Degree College, Morthad
The announcement of the National Education Policy 2020 (NEP-2020) marks one of the most comprehensive educational reforms in post-independent India. Replacing the National Policy on Education 1986, NEP-2020 envisions a transformative restructuring of India’s education system, aligned with the demands of the twenty-first century. While its primary objectives include improving access, equity, quality, affordability, and accountability in education, the policy also has broader social and political implications. Among these, its potential influence on the political socialization of Indian youth is particularly significant. Political socialization refers to the process through which individuals acquire political values, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviours that shape their political participation. In democratic societies such as India, educational institutions function as vital agents of political socialization, alongside family, media, peer groups, and civil society. Schools and universities not only transmit academic knowledge but also cultivate civic consciousness, constitutional values, critical thinking and democratic engagement. Therefore, any structural or curricular reform in education inevitably influences young citizens’ political orientation. The NEP-2020 emphasizes constitutional values, critical thinking, multidisciplinary learning, experiential education, and active citizenship. The policy foregrounds values such as democracy, secularism, equality, justice, and respect for diversity—principles embedded in the Indian Constitution. It also advocates civic responsibility, ethical reasoning, and awareness of rights and duties. By integrating these elements into school and higher education curricula, the NEP-2020 potentially reshapes the way Indian youth understand governance, public institutions, and their role within the democratic framework. Moreover, the policy’s focus on holistic development, flexibility in subject choices, vocational exposure, and digital literacy expands student’s-political awareness. The introduction of critical pedagogy, debate-based learning, and inquiry-driven approaches may encourage youth to question, deliberate, and participate actively in public life. Simultaneously, the emphasis on Indian knowledge systems, cultural heritage, and value-based education contributes to shaping the national identity and collective political consciousness. However, the intersection of educational reform and political socialization also raises important debates. Questions emerge regarding ideological orientation, curricular framing of history and civics, centralization versus federal autonomy, and the balance between cultural nationalism and pluralism. Given India’s diverse and politically dynamic society, the implementation of the NEP-2020 may generate varied outcomes in different social and regional contexts. Thus, examining the NEP-2020 through the lens of political socialization provides a critical framework for assessing its long-term democratic implications. This study seeks to analyse how the NEP-2020 influences the political socialization of youth in India. It explores the theoretical foundations of political socialization, identifies the key provisions of the policy that affect civic learning and democratic engagement, and evaluates both the opportunities and challenges arising from its implementation. By situating the NEP-2020 within broader debates on democracy, citizenship, and youth participation, this study aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of the evolving relationship between education policy and political culture in contemporary India.
KEYWORDS
This study examined the relationship between the National Education Policy 2020 (NEP-2020) and the political socialization of youth in India. The findings indicate that education, as a powerful instrument of social transformation, plays a crucial role in shaping political attitudes, civic values and democratic participation among young citizens. In this context, the NEP-2020 emerges not merely as an academic reform policy but as a framework with significant socio-political implications. The policy’s emphasis on constitutional values, critical thinking, experiential learning, and holistic development contributes positively to nurturing informed and responsible citizenry. By encouraging debate, inquiry-based learning, and multidisciplinary exposure, NEP-2020 strengthens the cognitive dimensions of political socialization, such as awareness, understanding, and value formation. Students are exposed to civic concepts, democratic ideals, and social responsibilities. However, this study also revealed certain challenges. While political awareness among youth appears to be growing, active political participation, such as voting behavior and involvement in public decision-making, remains comparatively moderate. This indicates a gap between political knowledge and practical engagement in politics. Additionally, variations in institutional capacity, teacher preparedness, and regional implementation affect the uniform realization of the policy objectives. In a country like India, where youth constitute a significant demographic force, the quality of political socialization directly influences democracy’s strength. The NEP-2020 provides a promising foundation for cultivating democratic ethos, pluralistic values, and civic responsibility. Nevertheless, its long-term success depends on effective implementation, continuous teacher training, inclusive curriculum design, and active, institutional support. In conclusion, the NEP-2020 has the potential to reshape not only the educational structure of India but also its democratic culture by fostering politically aware, critically thinking, and socially responsible youth. Sustained commitment from policymakers, educators, and institutions will determine whether this transformative vision translates into deeper democratic participation and a stronger political culture in India.
The following references have been used to support the theoretical framework and contextual analysis of the study on the National Education Policy 2020 (NEP-2020) and the political socialization of youth in India: Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Education, Government of India, New Delhi, India. Almond, Gabriel A. & Verba, Sidney. (1963). The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Countries. Princeton University Press. Easton, David, and Jack Dennis. (1969). Children in the Political System: The Origins of Political Legitimacy. McGraw-Hill. Hyman, Herbert H.. (1959). Political Socialization: A Study of the Psychology of Political Behavior. Free Press. Ostrom, Elinor. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press. Ministry of Education, Government of India. (Various Reports and Annual Publications). National Policy on Education, 1986. Government of India. NCERT. (Various publications on Civic Education and Political Science textbooks). National Council of Educational Research and Training, New Delhi, India. Journal articles on political socialization, civic education, and youth political participation published in peer-reviewed journals such as Economic and Political Weekly, Indian Journal of Political Science, and Journal of Educational Planning and Administration are included. Reports and surveys on youth political participation published by organizations such as the Election Commission of India and
Publication Date
6/9/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...