Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM.NEP016
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-8
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Associate Professor of Political Science
Government City College(A) Nayapul, Hyderabad
As the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 explicitly discusses internationalisation as one of the key factors of changing the face of higher education in India, it may be considered as a radically different approach to the past education reforms. The policy is in the highly globalised knowledge economy, and that is why it is geared towards rebranding India as not only a great exporter of students to foreign universities, but also as a higher education competitiveness destination in the global market. The vision of internationalisation interwoven in NEP 2020 is discussed with a critical analysis of its opportunities, challenges, and policy implications for the Indian higher education system. Internationalisation of the introduction of foreign universities, international academic partnerships, international student and faculty exchange, credit transfer, and innovation are the most crucial areas of internationalisation as per NEP 2020 to boost global rankings and research presence. Concurrently, the institutional and regulatory issues like unequal institutional strength, federal intricacies, and the quality assurance, cost, and the possible increase of educational disparities are still acute. The tension between global policies and safeguarding national educational interests, in particular, inclusiveness and national responsibility, is also listed as one of the issues of concern. It uses a qualitative, analytical approach that is informed by policy documents, regulatory frameworks, and the experience of other leading international higher education systems. Although NEP 2020 provides a comprehensive framework for the further development of internationalisation, its successful implementation must be balanced and regulated by effective regulatory control and constant government investment. The internationalisation in NEP 2020 should then be regarded not as an objective, but as a strategy to enhance the quality of academics, internationalisation, and accessibility of higher education in the Indian higher education landscape.
KEYWORDS
The orientation of internationalisation in the National Education Policy 2020 is an emphatic change in the Indian higher education direction since it represents a shift in institutional consolidation inward to an international intellectual outward interaction. The policy will transform Indian universities into a more globalised knowledge platform through fostering academic mobility, institutional partnerships, and inter-country research (Government of India, 2020). Such a change has great potential in improving pedagogical innovation, expanding an academic community, and improving research visibility, which will improve the international image of Indian higher education (Altbach, Reisberg, and Rumbley, 2009). At the same time, what the analysis does bring to the fore is that internationalisation cannot be judged only by policy intent or global aspiration. Its effectiveness is determined by how it reacts to structural constraints of the higher education system, like institutional inequities, and the complexity of regulation, as well as unequal access to financial resources and educational opportunities. The process is likely to turn into reinforcing the status quo, and opportunities will be concentrated in the already well-privileged institutions and socially privileged populations without a targeted and sustained intervention (Tilak, 2015; Varghese, 2013). Another aspect that the paper identifies as being critical is that internationalisation should be considered a multidimensional phenomenon, which suggests not just the institutional expansion, but intellectual and cultural negotiation. A successful international engagement ought to be founded on sustaining epistemic heterogeneity and integrating international worldviews in a way that does not compromise and suppress locally-based knowledge systems and developmental agendas. This moderate stance is such that internationalisation will help in intellectual enrichment without infringing on the academic autonomy and contextual relevance (De Wit et al., 2015). On the governance front, operationalisation of internationalisation on the NEP 2020 basis needs the population to invest long-term, have uniform regulatory frameworks, and institutionalisation. Inclusiveness, transparency, and accountability should be prioritised by the policy measures, and global engagement should be in line with the national goals, including social equity, innovation, and regional development. Basically, as we consider internationalisation as part of NEP 2020, it needs to be considered as a strategic process of improving the quality, access, and internationalisation of Indian higher education. Its globalisation will not be measured enough in its long-term success, but in the extent to which its benefits are fairly distributed among its institutions and learners in the diverse educational setting in India.
1. Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The internationalisation of higher education: Motivations and realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3–4), 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315307303542 2. Altbach, P. G., Reisberg, L., & Rumbley, L. E. (2009). Trends in global higher education: Tracking an academic revolution. UNESCO Publishing. 3. Agarwal, P. (2009). Indian higher education: Envisioning the future. Sage Publications. 4. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. 5. De Wit, H., Hunter, F., Howard, L., & Egron-Polak, E. (2015). Internationalisation of higher education. European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies. 6. Government of India. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. Ministry of Education. https://www.education.gov.in 7. Hazelkorn, E. (2018). Reshaping the world order of higher education: The role and impact of rankings on national and global systems. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 2(1), 4–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322969.2018.1424562 8. Jayaram, N. (2020). Internationalisation of higher education in India: Trends and challenges. Higher Education for the Future, 7(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/2347631119886411 9. Knight, J. (2012). Concepts, rationales, and interpretive frameworks in the internationalisation of higher education. In D. Deardorff et al. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of international higher education (pp. 27–42). Sage Publications. 10. Knight, J. (2015). Updated definition of internationalisation. International Higher Education, 33, 2–3.
Publication Date
6/9/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...