NETWORKED CONSTRAINTS: FEMINIST THEORY AND THE ARCHITECTURE OF WOMEN'S MARGINALITY

The intellectual archive considered in this paper spans a broad range, from literary fiction to corporate memoir, from investigative journalism to biopolitical theory, and from ecofeminist philosophy to platform studies. This diversity is not necessarily a flaw; rather, it is a virtue, as it captures the multifaceted nature of the conditions that constrain women's lives across places, times, and axes of social difference. Reading these sources together, this paper suggests that there are nine persistent constraints- structural dispossession, economic insecurity, cultural orthodoxy, reproductive control, political disenfranchisement, symbolic effacement, technological marginalisation, institutional bias, and intersectional discrimination – that constitute an interlocking architecture of marginality. The current period is not an age in which these constraints are being surmounted; rather, it is one in which they are being intensified and reconfigured by digitisation, global warming, and neoliberal governmentality. The issues originally outlined by Mahasweta Devi and Angela Davis are today replicated on an algorithmic scale; the dispossession described by P. Sainath and Vandana Shiva is today exacerbated by ecological devastation caused by climate change; the systemic inequalities analysed by Caroline Criado Perez and Judy Wajcman have been embedded in technological processes that enable us to gain access to jobs, loans, health services, and political discourse. To read the archive from start to finish is not to traverse from issue to resolution; rather, it is to travel from identification to re-identification, from identifying a constraint in one context to its transformation in another. What these narratives have taught us about the process of emancipation is certainly not fatalism, but strategic complexity. What emancipation requires, according to this set of texts, is complex because emancipation is a process, an ongoing struggle that takes place on various fronts. That such strategic complexity should emerge as a political insight in its own right represents no small accomplishment; it took decades of struggles, both scholarly and activist, for feminism to move beyond a single-axis politics. The challenge ahead is to turn that strategic complexity into effective action against the network structure of oppression in the contemporary world.  

·                  Criado Pérez, C. (2019). Invisible women: Exposing data bias in a world designed for men. Chatto & Windus. ·                  Davis, A. Y. (1981). Women, race & class. Random House. ·                  Devi, M. (1997). Breast stories (G. C. Spivak, Trans.). Seagull Books. ·                  Gajjala, R. (2019). Digital diasporas: Labour and affect in gendered Indian digital publics. Rowman & Littlefield. ·                  Gates, M. (2019). The moment of lift: How empowering women changes the world. Flatiron Books. ·                  Gill, R. (2007). Gender and the media. Polity Press. ·                  Hartmann, B. (1995). Reproductive rights and wrongs: The global politics of population control (Rev. ed.). South End Press. ·                  Krawcheck, S. (2017). Own it: The power of women at work. Currency. ·                  Menon, N. (2004). Recovering subversion: Feminist politics beyond the law. Permanent Black. ·                  Mohanty, C. T. (2003). Feminism without borders: Decolonising theory, practising solidarity. Duke University Press. ·                  Rapp, R. (1999). Testing women, testing the fetus: The social impact of amniocentesis in America. Routledge. ·                  Roy, A. (1999). The greater common good. India Book Distributors.