Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63274
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Electrical Engineering
Nanasaheb Mahadik College of Engineering
The rapid evolution of industrial automation and smart grid technology has exposed the inherent limitations of classical control theories. Standard Proportional-Integral-Derivative (PID) and Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) controllers rely heavily on precise mathematical modelling and the assumption of linearity. However, most electrical "plants"—including Induction Motors (IM), Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (PMSM), and Power Electronic Converters—are characterized by high-degree nonlinearities, magnetic saturation, and time-varying parameters such as temperature-dependent resistance shifts. This seminar explores the integration of Neurological Network-Based Control Systems (NNBCS) as a robust, data-driven alternative to conventional modelling. By leveraging the universal approximation capabilities of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs), these systems can identify and compensate for unmodeled dynamics without an explicit transfer function $G(s)$. The report focuses on three primary architectural implementations: Neural System Identification, where the network creates a "digital twin" of the plant; Neuro-Adaptive PID Control, where the NN dynamically tunes controller gains to eliminate overshoot; and Direct Inverse Control, where the network learns the inverse physics of the electrical drive to provide high-precision trajectory tracking. Specific attention is given to the application of these networks in Power Electronics and Machine Drives. Case studies presented include Sensor less Speed Control of asynchronous machines, where NNs estimate rotor position from stator current/voltage, and Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) in Photovoltaic (PV) systems, where neural algorithms significantly reduce settling time compared to traditional "Perturb and Observe" methods. Furthermore, the abstract addresses the role of NNBCS in improving Power Quality through the real-time estimation and cancellation of Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) using Active Power Filters. Despite the superior performance in handling nonlinearities, the transition to NN-based control faces challenges regarding computational latency and formal stability verification (the "Black Box" problem). The report concludes by evaluating implementation strategies using high-speed hardware such as Digital Signal Processors (DSPs) and Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), highlighting the future shift toward Edge AI in self-optimizing electrical infrastructure and resilient smart grids.
KEYWORDS
Neural network-based control represents the next evolution in electrical engineering. By moving from reactive PID logic to predictive "learned" logic, we can create smarter power grids, more efficient electric vehicles, and resilient industrial automation systems.
1. Bing, Z., et al. (2018). A Survey of Robotics Control Based on Learning-Inspired Spiking Neural Networks. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2018.00035 Cited by: 252 2. Bolzern, P., et al. (2013). Almost sure stability of Markov jump linear systems with deterministic switching. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 58(1), 209–214. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2012.2203049 3. Cirrincione, M., et al. (2013). Linear Neural Networks applied to Power Converters and AC Electrical Drives. Renewable Energy and Power Quality Journal, 1(11), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.24084/repqj11.005 Cited by: 3 4. Dawahdeh, A., et al. (2024). Novel MPPT Controller Augmented with Neural Network for Use with Photovoltaic Systems Experiencing Rapid Solar Radiation Changes. Sustainability, 16(3), 1021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031021 Cited by: 27 5. Guez, A., et al. (1988). Neural network architecture for control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 8(2), 22–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/37.1869 Cited by: 201 6. Hampel, S., et al. (2015). A neural command circuit for grooming movement control. eLife, 4. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.08758 Cited by: 181 7. Kadem, M., et al. (2020). Artificial Neural Network Active Power Filter with Immunity in Distributed Generation. Periodica Polytechnica Mechanical Engineering, 64(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.3311/ppme.12775 Cited by: 17 8. Milles, A., et al. (2026). Neural Networks-Based 12-Sector Direct Torque Control of Asynchronous Machine Drives: Experimental Results. Artificial Intelligence Research and Applications (AIra), 2(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.20508/qyxvy507 9. Mu, Q., et al. (2023). Adaptive neural network prescribed performance control for dual switching nonlinear time-delay system. Scientific Reports, 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35307-0 Cited by: 7 10. Sammons, M., et al. (2024). Brain-body physiology: Local, reflex, and central communication. Cell, 187(21), 5877–5890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2024.08.050 Cited by: 64
Publication Date
5/15/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...