Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63725
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Master of Computer Applications
Bapuji Institute of Engineering and Technology
Master of Computer Applications
Bapuji Institute of Engineering and Technology
Although Artificial Intelligence gained widespread momentum in critical fields like health economics and autonomous technologies it has recently addressed a notable shortcoming in current advanced models: lack of interpretation. Although deep learning models have reached superhuman levels in pattern recognition and prediction tasks within Big Data these models act similarly to "black boxes." They associate inputs with outputs through high-dimensional vector spaces which humans cannot interpret. However symbolic Artificial Intelligence models provide advanced interpretation capabilities through their workings based on symbolic logic and reasoning. These models have not yet scaled well to accommodate uncontrolled Big Data. The Proposed work aims at developing a Neural-Symbolic Big Data Reasoning Model which is a hybrid architecture approach to bridge the gap between the learning ability of neural networks and the reasoning ability offered by symbolic logic. In this approach the connectionist learning aspect offered by neural networks would be combined with symbolic representation capabilities to create a system that would develop an Explainable AI (XAI) methodology with the ability to handle large datasets while at the same time offering clear interpretable and meaningful results to explain their decisions. The Proposed work would make use of deep neuronic networks for carrying out the lower-level features’ extraction with regard to amorphous data forms such as image text or logs which would be mapped to create a symbolic representation graph. A reasoning engine would be utilized to make inferential decisions using symbolic logic ensuring that every predictive result has a traceable decision path which would not only improve trust but also make the system more robust in terms of handling sparse data.
KEYWORDS
The Neural-Symbolic Big Data Reasoning Model represents a transformative step forward in the field of Artificial Intelligence. By effectively marrying the learning capabilities of deep neural networks with the reasoning rigor of symbolic logic this project addresses the critical bottleneck of "black box" AI. The system successfully demonstrates that it is possible to achieve high- performance analytics on Big Data while maintaining full transparency and interpretability. This project proves that explainability does not have to come at the cost of accuracy. The hybrid architecture allows for robust decision-making even in noisy or data-scarce environments making it ideal for high-stakes industries like healthcare and finance. The implementation of the feedback loop where logic guides learning ensures that the AI aligns with human values and business constraints. Ultimately this model paves the way for the next generation of AI systems—systems that are not individual powerful but also trustworthy accountable and intelligible to the humans they serve.
1. Besold T. R. et al. "Neural-Symbolic Learning and Reasoning: A Survey and Interpretation." . 2. Garcez A. S. et al. "Neural-Symbolic Computing: An Effective Methodology for Principled Integration of Learning and Reasoning." IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 2015. 3. De Raedt L. et al. "Neuro-Symbolic AI: The 3rd Wave." Artificial Intelligence Review 2020. 4. Manhaeve R. et al. "DeepProbLog: Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming." Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) 2018. 5. Gunning D. "Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)." Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) 2017.
Publication Date
5/22/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...