Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM58532
Volume:
10 |
3 |
Mar 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Legal documents are usually long, complex, and difficult to understand for common people. Many individuals face problems because legal language is confusing, legal services are expensive, and court procedures take a long time. Automated systems also struggle to accurately interpret and explain legal documents due to their complex structure and domain specific terminology. Existing artificial intelligence approaches have several limitations when applied to legal document analysis. Deep learning models can understand the meaning of text but cannot explain legal logic clearly, while rule-based systems can apply logic but cannot handle different types of legal language effectively. To solve this problem, this project proposes a Neuro-Symbolic AI system for legal document reasoning. The system combines a transformer-based language model to understand legal text with a rule-based reasoning system to apply legal logic. First, the system analyzes legal documents and extracts important information using a neural model. Then, symbolic rules are applied to perform logical reasoning and generate clear, explainable outcomes. Plain Language Summary: This research introduces a system called Neuro-Symbolic AI for Legal Document Reasoning, designed to make legal documents easier to understand. Legal texts are often long, complex, and difficult for common people to interpret without expert help. This system combines two approaches: one that understands the meaning of legal language (using AI models like LegalBERT) and another that applies logical rules to analyze the content.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/2/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...