Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68325
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Information Technology
Vidyalankar Institute of Technology
Information Technology
Vidyalankar Institute of Technology
Information Technology
Vidyalankar Institute of Technology
Information Technology
Vidyalankar Institute of Technology
Information Technology
Vidyalankar Institute of Technology
Information Technology
Vidyalankar Institute of Technology
Mental-health-related information is communicated through several channels, including written language, speech, and structured self-report questionnaires. Systems that analyse only one channel may overlook contextual or behavioural information, while emotion recognition alone cannot establish a mental-health diagnosis or determine suicide risk. This paper presents NeuroAI, a research-oriented multimodal framework that integrates text emotion recognition, text-based suicide/self-harm risk screening, speech emotion recognition, and deterministic Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scoring within a unified application. The text emotion component uses a RoBERTa-based classifier for 28 categories derived from GoEmotions. A separate RoBERTabased binary classifier detects language patterns associated with potential suicide/self-harm risk. The speech pipeline converts audio to mono at 22,050 Hz, extracts 715 acoustic features, and uses a PyTorch VoiceNet model to classify six emotion categories. PHQ-9 responses are summed deterministically to obtain a score between 0 and 27. A transparent weighted fusion mechanism combines available outputs using configured weights of 35% for text, 35% for voice, 20% for PHQ-9, and 10% for the safety-risk signal. The framework also supports missing-modality weight renormalization, rule-based safety overrides, historical summaries, alerts, and clinician-oriented workflows. Reported component results are 56.50% accuracy and 55.92% weighted F1-score for text emotion recognition, 97.38% accuracy and F1-score for the binary safety classifier, and 76.28% held-out validation accuracy for speech emotion recognition. These figures describe separate component tasks and do not represent endto-end clinical performance. The proposed contribution is an integrated and inspectable software workflow; clinical validity and overall fusion accuracy remain to be established through independent evaluation.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented NeuroAI, a multimodal framework integrating text emotion recognition, separate suicide/selfharm risk screening, speech emotion recognition, deterministic PHQ-9 scoring, weighted fusion, and clinician-oriented application workflows. The reported component results were 56.50% accuracy and 55.92% weighted F1-score for 28-class text emotion recognition, 97.38% accuracy and F1-score for binary safety screening, and 76.28% held-out validation accuracy for six-class speech emotion recognition. The framework uses configurable weights, missing-modality renormalization, and rule-based safety overrides to make the combined workflow more inspectable. The main contribution is the integration of heterogeneous model outputs and structured questionnaire scoring into one software workflow, rather than a claim of clinical validation. Because the fusion engine has not been evaluated on an independent labeled multimodal clinical dataset, no overall system accuracy is reported. NeuroAI should be considered a non-diagnostic research and decision-support prototype. Future work must establish external validity, measure fusion performance, assess robustness and fairness, and evaluate safety under qualified human oversight before clinical deployment.
[1] D. Demszky, D. Movshovitz-Attias, J. Ko, A. Cowen, G. Nemade, and S. Ravi, “GoEmotions: A Dataset of Fine-Grained Emotions,” in Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020, pp. 4040–4054. [2] J. Devlin, M.-W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, “BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding,” in Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, 2019, pp. 4171–4186. [3] Y. Liu et al., “RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach,” arXiv:1907.11692, 2019. [4] S. B. Davis and P. Mermelstein, “Comparison of Parametric Representations for Monosyllabic Word Recognition in Continuously Spoken Sentences,” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 357–366, 1980. [5] H. Cao, D. G. Cooper, M. K. Keutmann, R. C. Gur, A. Nenkova, and R. Verma, “CREMA-D: Crowd-Sourced Emotional Multimodal Actors Dataset,” IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 377–390, 2014. [6] Y.-H. H. Tsai et al., “Multimodal Transformer for Unaligned Multimodal Language Sequences,” in Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019, pp. 6558–6569. [7] K. Kroenke, R. L. Spitzer, and J. B. W. Williams, “The PHQ-9: Validity of a Brief Depression Severity Measure,” Journal of General Internal Medicine, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 606–613, 2001.
Publication Date
10/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...