Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM56655
Volume:
10 |
2 |
Feb 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Modern autonomous systems in the contemporary world typically optimize immediate actions based on current states, which often results in short-term decision behavior and suboptimal performance in complex and uncertain environments. This paper presents NEXUS, a future-oriented decision framework that reformulates decision-making as an optimization over multiple possible future trajectories rather than individual actions. The proposed framework generates probabilistic future scenarios using ensemble world models, evaluates them using multi-objective criteria including performance, safety, and uncertainty, and selects actions that lead to the most desirable future outcome. The methodology integrates model-based reinforcement learning, probabilistic modeling, and uncertainty-aware trajectory optimization to enable proactive risk mitigation and long-term decision stability. Experimental evaluation in simulated robotic control and cybersecurity environments demonstrates improved performance, reduced safety violations, and enhanced robustness compared to conventional reinforcement learning approaches. The results establish future-centric optimization as an effective paradigm for autonomous decision-making in dynamic systems.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/17/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...