Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62511
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Computer Science and Engineering (Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning)
Babu Banarasi Das Institute of Technology & Management
Computer Science and Engineering (Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning)
Babu Banarasi Das Institute of Technology & Management
Computer Science and Engineering (Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning)
Babu Banarasi Das Institute of Technology & Management
Credit card fraud detection represents a critical challenge for global financial systems, with annual losses exceeding 30-40 billion USD. While machine learning models achieve high detection accuracy, their opacity creates regulatory, operational, and trust barriers. This paper synthesizes 28 recent studies examining the integration of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in fraud detection systems. We analyze how NLP techniques—including BERT-based transformers, LSTM networks, and attention mechanisms—extract semantic meaning from transaction descriptions, merchant narratives, and customer communications to augment traditional numerical features. Concurrently, XAI methods including SHAP, LIME, and attention visualization provide interpretable explanations required by emerging regulations such as GDPR and the EU AI Act. Our systematic review reveals that hybrid NLP+XAI approaches achieve 95% precision while maintaining transparency, yet significant deployment challenges persist. Real-time explanation generation within 100-300 millisecond authorization windows remains computationally prohibitive. Graph neural networks show exceptional promise (99% accuracy), while federated learning approaches enable privacy-preserving collaborative fraud detection. Critical research gaps are identified: scarcity of standardized NLP-rich fraud datasets, insufficient real-time explainability frameworks, and limited adversarial robustness evaluation.
KEYWORDS
This systematic review establishes six key findings: (1) NLP enhances fraud detection accuracy by 5-15% through text-based features from transaction descriptions and customer communications [2], [3]; (2) XAI methods enable transparency—SHAP and LIME successfully explain fraud decisions, with attention-based models providing inherent interpretability [5]; (3) Combined NLP+XAI achieves 95% precision while maintaining interpretability [2], [9]; (4) Real-time deployment requires substantial optimization through model distillation, quantization, and selective application [2], [14]; (5) Graph Neural Networks represent an emerging frontier with 99% accuracy through transaction network structure capture [7], [8]; and (6) Regulatory compliance increasingly drives explainability as a requirement rather than optional enhancement [1].
[1] FinCrime Central Editorial. (2025). Why AI explainability is becoming a regulatory imperative in AML and financial crime prevention. FinCrime Central, September 10, 2025. [2] Longo, L., & Raufi, B. (2024). A comparative analysis of SHAP, LIME, ANCHORS, and DICE for interpreting a dense neural network in credit card fraud detection. Technological University Dublin Conference Proceedings, 1453, 1-18. [3] Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence Editorial Board. (2025). Enhancing credit card fraud detection using traditional and deep learning approaches. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1643292. [4] Ranade, S., & Mehta, A. (2025). Comparative analysis of machine learning models for credit card fraud detection with SMOTE. International Journal of Sustainable Smart and Innovative Systems Engineering, 15(5), 504-518. [5] Ojo, I. P., & Tomy, A. (2025). Explainable AI for credit card fraud detection: Bridging the gap between accuracy and interpretability. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 25(2), 1246-1256. [6] Rajkumar, P., & Sinha, R. (2024). Optimizing credit card fraud detection with random forests and neural networks. PMC/NIH Research Publications, 12098799, 1-18. [7] Xiang, Y., Li, W., & Cheng, D. (2024). Graph neural networks for financial fraud detection: A comprehensive review of methodologies and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.05815. [8] Ding, X., Lv, H., Zhao, Y., Rao, R. M., & Zhu, Y. (2024). Real-time transaction fraud detection via heterogeneous temporal graph neural networks. Proceedings of International Conference on AI Finance, 365-378. [9] Khandelwal, C. (2024). Multi-model stacking ensemble framework for financial fraud detection. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer and Communication Engineering, 12(8), 2502-2520. [10] Martini, R., & Barua, A. (2020). Deep recurrent neural networks for fraud detection on debit card transactions. Edinburgh Business School CRC Working Papers, 29, 1-15.
Publication Date
5/10/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...