Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM55682
Volume:
9 |
12 |
Dec 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming government operations and influencing social and economic systems across the globe. While AI delivers substantial benefits such as enhanced financial services, improved medical diagnostics, and accelerated decision-making, it also presents critical ethical, legal, and societal challenges. These challenges include algorithmic bias, limited transparency, privacy risks, and unclear accountability for AI-driven outcomes. The long-term success and widespread adoption of AI technologies depend heavily on public trust, which may be undermined by ineffective or ambiguous regulatory frameworks. This study conducts a comparative analysis of AI governance approaches adopted by leading AI-driven regions, including the United States, the European Union, China, and emerging AI hubs. It evaluates regulatory frameworks, ethical standards, and institutional practices using benchmarks such as transparency, fairness, accountability, and stakeholder participation. The analysis is based on legislation, government initiatives, international guidelines, and scholarly literature. The findings indicate that public trust in AI is closely linked to policies that promote openness, enforce accountability, and encourage multi-stakeholder involvement, whereas inconsistent or vague regulations create uncertainty and impede AI diffusion.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...