Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66109
Volume:
10 |
7 |
Jul 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Chemical Engineering
Annamalai University
Department of Chemical Engineering
Annamalai University
Department of Chemical Engineering
Adhiparasakthi Engineering College
Department of Offshore Engineering
QHSE Business School
Department of Management Studies
Chaitanya Bharathi Institute of Technology
Semiconductor manufacturing is expanding in India through the establishment of new fabrication, assembly, testing, marking, and packaging facilities. Although this growth supports strategic electronics manufacturing, it also introduces complex occupational health and safety risks. Semiconductor facilities use hazardous chemicals, toxic and pyrophoric gases, high-energy equipment, cleanroom systems, ergonomic tasks, and tightly controlled production environments. This manuscript reviews the major occupational hazards and safety best practices relevant to Indian semiconductor manufacturing. Using a narrative literature and policy review, it draws on semiconductor occupational health studies, chemical exposure research, international safety guidance, and India’s regulatory framework to identify the gaps. The review found that the most significant hazards include exposure to acids, solvents, dopant gases, photoresists, plasma by-products, noise, radiation, ergonomic strain, heat stress, shift work, and psychosocial stress. In India, best practices should integrate the Occupational Safety, Health and Working Conditions Code, hazardous chemical rules, factory licensing, process safety management, real-time gas detection, medical surveillance, emergency preparedness, and worker participation. The study concludes that India’s semiconductor growth must be matched by strong environmental, health and safety (EHS) systems, transparent exposure monitoring, and sector-specific occupational health research.
KEYWORDS
India has a significant industrial opportunity in semiconductor manufacturing, but without developing occupational health and safety systems at the same rate as production capacity, it can present complex hazards from chemicals, specialty gases, cleanroom work, high-energy tools, ergonomic stressors, shift work, and waste handling. Gaps in exposure knowledge, chemical transparency, and long-term worker health surveillance persist in international semiconductor literature. India has a good legal foundation in its OSH Code, but semiconductor facilities need sector-specific controls including process safety management, gas detection, chemical governance, medical surveillance, contractor safety, and emergency preparedness. India should prevent by design: build fabs and OSAT facilities with world-class EHS systems from the beginning, not after incidents happen. Governments take a more focused and multi-faceted approach to tackling PFAS concerns. Protecting human health and the environment, this vital industry will continue to prosper by collaborating and innovating. Advocate for PFAS legislation and regulations that give authorities the ability to conduct risk-based analysis and controls on emissions and the ability to access chemicals vital to the production of semiconductors. Any policy should take into consideration the reality that there is no foreseeable way to develop an alternative to PFAS for critical applications in the semiconductor industry within decades. Advocate for R&D programs that draw on industry and academic expertise to improve detection, monitoring, control, and abatement; to explore alternatives to PFAS; and to address technical hurdles in developing and deploying alternative materials and manufacturing processes.
1. Yoon, C. (2012). Much concern but little research on semiconductor occupational health issues. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 27(5), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2012.27.5.461 2. Yoon C, Kim S, Park D, Choi Y, Jo J, Lee K. (2020). Chemical Use and Associated Health Concerns in the Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry. Safety and Health at Work, Vol. 11, no. 4 pp.500–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2020.04.005 3. Kim, K., Sung, H.K., Jang, J., Suh, E.E., Lee, K., & Park, S.K. Health Status, Health-Related Factors and Work Environment in Korean Semiconductor Workers between 1984–2012: A Qualitative Study and a Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022 May, 19(10):6286. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19106286 4. Kim, K., Sung, H. K., Jang, J., Kang, C.-M., Lee, K., & Park, S. K. (2022). Biological Assessment of Potential Exposure to Occupational Substances in Current Semiconductor Workers with at Least 5 Years of Employment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8737. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148737 5. Dong-Uk Park, Sangjun Choi, Seunghee Lee, Dong-Hee Koh, Hyoung-Ryoul Kim, Kyong-Hui Lee, Jihoon Park, Occupational Characteristics of Semiconductor Workers with Cancer and Rare Diseases Registered with a Workers' Compensation Program in Korea, Safety and Health at Work, Volume 10, Issue 3, 2019, Pages 347-354, ISSN 2093-7911, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2019.03.003. 6. Kim, M.-H., Kim, H., & Paek, D. (2013). The health impacts of semiconductor production: An epidemiologic review. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 20(2), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1179/2049396713y.0000000050 7. Stasiła-Sieradzka M, Chudzicka-Czupała A, Znajmiecka-Sikora M (2020) Work safety climate. Comparison of selected occupational groups. PLoS ONE 15(12): e0243056. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243056 8. Choi, K.-M., & Lee, S.-J. (2022). Physicochemical characteristics and occupational exposure of silica particles as byproducts in a semiconductor sub fab. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1791. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031791 9. Costantino, F., Falegnami, A., Fedele, L., Bernabei, M., Stabile, S., & Bentivenga, R. (2021). New and emerging hazards for health and safety within digitalized manufacturing systems. Sustainability, 13(19), 10948. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910948 10. Watterson, A. (2006). Regulation of occupational health and safety in the semiconductor industry: Enforcement problems and solutions. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 12(1), 72–80. https://doi.org/10.1179/oeh.2006.12.1.72
Publication Date
7/16/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...