Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62909
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Science
KCC Institute of Technology and Management, Greater Noida, India
Department of Computer Science
KCC Institute of Technology and Management, Greater Noida, India
Department of Computer Science
KCC Institute of Technology and Management, Greater Noida, India
Department of Computer Science
KCC Institute of Technology and Management, Greater Noida, India
Department of Computer Science
KCC Institute of Technology and Management, Greater Noida, India
Figuring out who might not pay back loans stays tough for banks. Old-school methods based on fixed rules often miss the mark, both in guessing right and showing how they work. Even though computers now predict better using patterns, most act like hidden machines - nobody sees inside, which causes problems under strict finance laws. Here comes OPTI Recourse: a system built to score borrowers well while still letting regulators clearly understand each decision made. A single XGBoost model sits at the core, adjusted carefully using Optuna’s smart search across uneven data points. Because risk levels differ widely, the tuning process focuses heavily on balance rather than raw speed. Outputs shift smoothly into familiar score ranges plus clear grade tags people recognize. Strong separation shows up right away - nearly all risky cases stand apart cleanly from safer ones. The system hits 0.98 on AUC while reaching 86.87 on KS, both signs it captures differences well. No extra layers or fixes come after; everything works straight out of the box. Clarity comes first here. Because SHAP and LIME live inside the setup, each yes or no on a loan makes sense when examined closely. What pushes decisions forward gets shown clearly, helping teams talk about risks without confusion while keeping pace with how rules around AI keep shifting. Built entirely in containers, it runs on microservices - one part handles visuals through Streamlit, another manages requests via a Django REST API - shaped to grow smoothly even under heavy daily use. Despite intense demand, this setup stays strong without losing its adaptable design. Results show clear predictions can go hand in hand with transparency when judging credit risk. A path opens here - not just for insight but for change - people learn steps to boost their credit health. Fairness gains ground too, as the method builds room for balanced outcomes in lending choices.
KEYWORDS
A new tool called OPTI Recourse helps assess who might struggle to repay loans. It blends strong prediction models with clear explanations of how decisions are made. Instead of just giving results, it shows why they happen using real world data patterns. At its core sits a modified XGBoost setup tuned for uneven financial records. Predictions turn into straightforward ratings anyone can grasp quickly. Hidden influences behind each outcome come to light through SHAP and LIME analysis. Clarity improves when people see what shaped a verdict. Financial teams gain insight not only into risks but also their roots. It turns out clear models can also predict well, which fits neatly into strict regulatory settings. Right now the emphasis sits firmly on getting predictions right and explanations understandable. Down the line, efforts will weave in fairer training methods along with ways for people to act on feedback. Trust grows when systems show their reasoning while staying ethically grounded. Progress here points quietly to smarter, open, usable AI tools in how lenders judge risk.
1. Chen, Y., Calabrese, R., Martin-Barragan, B.: Interpretable machine learning for imbalanced credit scoring datasets. Eu- ropean Journal of Operational Research 312(1), 357–372 (2024). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/ S0377221723005088 2. Ahmed, M.R., et al.: Enhancing transparency and fairness in automated credit decisions using hybrid machine learning. Scientific Reports 14(1), 75026 (2024). https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-75026-8 3. Kisten, K., et al.: Enhancing fairness in credit assessment: mitigation strategies and implementation. IEEE Access 12 (2024). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10420549 4. Mestiri, S.: Credit scoring using machine learning and deep learning-based models. Data Science in Finance and Economics 4(2), 236–248 (2024). https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/10.3934/DSFE.2024009 5. Tavakoli, M., et al.: Multi-modal deep learning for credit rating prediction using financial statements and market data. Neuro- computing 585 (2025). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231225000821 6. Li, J.: Area under the ROC curve has the most consistent evaluation for binary classification. PLoS ONE 19(12) (2024). https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0316019 7. Kwon, S., Jang, J., Kim, C.: Credit scoring using multi-task Siamese neural networks. Expert Systems with Applications 255 (2025). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417425001234 8. Lundberg, S.M., Lee, S.I.: A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. NeurIPS (2017). https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1705.07874 9. Ribeiro, M.T., Singh, S., Guestrin, C.: Why should I trust you? Explaining the predictions of any classifier. KDD (2016). https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2939672.2939778 10. Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Russell, C.: Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology (2017). https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.00399
Publication Date
5/11/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...