Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM39405
Volume:
8 |
12 |
Dec 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
This paper investigates the optimization of Radix-8 Booth Multipliers, which are essential for efficient arithmetic operations in modern digital systems, particularly in applications such as digital signal processing, telecommunications, and image processing where rapid and accurate calculations are crucial. The study aims to enhance performance by focusing on reducing both delay and area while ensuring that acceptable accuracy levels are maintained for error-tolerant applications. To achieve these optimization goals, we compare three methodologies: the Carry Save Adder (CSA), the Kogge Stone Adder (KSA), and the Carry Look-Ahead Adder (CLA), each of which presents unique advantages and trade-offs in terms of speed, area utilization, and power consumption. The results of our analysis demonstrate that the Kogge Stone Adder provides the best overall performance in terms of speed and area efficiency, making it the most suitable choice for optimizing Radix-8 Booth Multipliers, particularly in scenarios where high performance and efficient resource use are critical. By emphasizing these findings, this study contributes valuable insights into the design of more efficient multipliers that can meet the increasing demands of contemporary digital applications.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/11/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...