Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67698
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-3
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
Priyadarshini College of Engineering, Nagpur

Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
Priyadarshini College of Engineering, Nagpur

Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
Priyadarshini College of Engineering, Nagpur

Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
Priyadarshini College of Engineering, Nagpur

Department of Artificial Intelligence and Data Science
Priyadarshini College of Engineering, Nagpur
Osteoporosis is a long-term skeletal condition in which bone strength decreases and the likelihood of fragility fractures rises. Because the condition can develop without noticeable symptoms, identifying people at elevated risk before a fracture occurs is an important preventive goal. Conventional assessment commonly depends on bone mineral density and established clinical risk tools, although access to screening is not uniform across healthcare settings. Recent studies have examined machine learning (ML), deep learning, medical imaging, and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) for osteoporosis classification and fracture-risk estimation. This review considers these developments with emphasis on clinical and lifestyle information, interpretable predictions, and decision-support applications. Existing reviews show encouraging results from AI-based methods, but they also point to concerns involving dataset variation, external validation, reporting standards, interpretability, and integration into clinical practice. Building on this evidence, the proposed OsteoAI approach combines routine clinical and lifestyle inputs with explainable ML, risk categories, personalized preventive suggestions, and lifestyle-based “what-if” simulation. The proposed system is presented as a project-level decision-support direction and not as a substitute for professional diagnosis.
KEYWORDS
The reviewed literature shows a growing role for artificial intelligence in osteoporosis classification, fracture-risk prediction, bone-property assessment, and clinical decision support. Machine learning and deep learning provide ways to analyze complex clinical and imaging information, while XAI methods can make individual model outputs easier to interpret. However, important challenges remain, particularly in validation, dataset heterogeneity, reporting quality, generalizability, and integration into clinical practice. OsteoAI builds on these research directions by proposing an explainable osteoporosis risk-assessment framework based on clinical and lifestyle information, supported by personalized preventive guidance and lifestyle simulation. The literature provides a clear rationale for this direction, but it also makes clear that rigorous validation and careful clinical positioning are essential before such a system could be considered for real-world healthcare use.
[1] G. Gatineau, E. Shevroja, C. Vendrami, E. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, W. D. Leslie, O. Lamy, and D. Hans, “Development and reporting of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis management,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1553–1573, 2024, doi: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae131. [2] A. Conforti, M. Ruggiero, L. Lucchetti, V. Cipolloni, F. D. Galati, M. Gentile, and A. Lo Gullo, “Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Osteoporosis: A Comprehensive Review,” Medicina, vol. 62, no. 1, 27, 2025, doi: 10.3390/medicina62010027. [3] Y. Wu, J. Chao, M. Bao, and N. Zhang, “Predictive value of machine learning on fracture risk in osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” BMJ Open, vol. 13, no. 12, e071430, 2023, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071430. [4] V. V. Khanna, K. Chadaga, N. Sampathila, R. Chadaga, S. Prabhu, S. K. S., A. S. Jagdale, and D. Bhat, “A decision support system for osteoporosis risk prediction using machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 12, e22456, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22456. [5] R. W. Liu, W. Ong, A. Makmur, N. Kumar, X. Z. Low, S. Ge, Y. L. Tan, D. F. K. Ting, J. H. Tan, and J. T. P. D. Hallinan, “Application of Artificial Intelligence Methods on Osteoporosis Classification with Radiographs—A Systematic Review,” Bioengineering, vol. 11, no. 5, 484, 2024, doi: 10.3390/bioengineering11050484. [6] M. Sadat-Ali, B. A. Alzahrani, T. S. Alqahtani, M. A. Alotaibi, A. M. Alhalafi, A. A. Alsousi, and A. M. Alasiri, “Accuracy of artificial intelligence in prediction of osteoporotic fractures in comparison with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool: A systematic review,” World Journal of Orthopedics, vol. 16, no. 4, 103572, 2025, doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i4.103572. [7] Z. Zhang, Y. He, Z. Mo, P. Zhang, Z. Tian, and L. Huang, “Artificial Intelligence for Osteoporosis Diagnosis, Risk Prediction and Therapy: Current Advances, Clinical Challenges, and Future Perspectives,” Clinical Interventions in Aging, vol. 21, 607232, 2026. [8] S.-T. Fan, M. Lu, J.-L. Dong, Y.-L. Li, L.-N. Hao, R.- C. Dong, and M.-D. Hou, “Application of artificial intelligence in osteoporosis: a review,” Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 12, 1718554, 2025, doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1718554.
Publication Date
10/6/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...