Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM56708
Volume:
10 |
2 |
Feb 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Digital learning platforms have significantly expanded access to education; however, many systems continue to follow instructor-centric and subscription-based models that restrict participation and personalization. In response, recent research has explored peer-to-peer learning environments in which users collaboratively exchange knowledge and practical skills. Studies in collaborative education, educational recommender systems, and online communities propose mechanisms such as partner-matching algorithms, communication support, and reputation-based trust evaluation to improve engagement and learning effectiveness. Nevertheless, existing approaches typically address these components independently, leading to challenges in credibility assurance, scalability, and sustained interaction. This paper presents a comprehensive survey of peer learning and skill-sharing platforms by analyzing their methodologies, advantages, and limitations reported in prior research. Based on the comparative analysis, the study identifies the need for an integrated framework that combines intelligent matching, interaction support, and reliability assessment to enable structured and accessible knowledge exchange.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
2/18/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...