Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66948
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-11
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
CIVIL ENGINEERING
ALPINE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ,UJJAIN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
ALPINE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ,UJJAIN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
ALPINE INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ,UJJAIN
This study evaluates the seismic performance of a G+6 L-shaped multi-bay steel building using Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) and Time History Analysis (THA) in STAAD.Pro. The analysis is carried out as per IS 1893 (Part 1):2016 for seismic Zone IV. The seismic response is compared in terms of base shear, storey displacement, storey drift, overturning moment, and natural frequency. The results show that RSA produces higher base shear, while LTHA gives higher storey displacement and overturning moment. The study demonstrates that both methods provide useful information for assessing the seismic behavior of irregular steel structures Two linear dynamic analysis methods, namely Time History Analysis (THA) and Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA), Basic guidelines for the preparation of a technical work for an IJRESM Journal Publication are presented. This document is itself an example of the desired layout (inclusive of this abstract) and can be used as a template.
KEYWORDS
The present study evaluated the seismic performance of a G+6 L-shaped multi-bay steel building using Response Spectrum Analysis (RSA) and Time History Analysis (THA) in STAAD.Pro under Seismic Zone IV. The results showed that RSA produced higher base shear, while THA resulted in higher displacement, storey drift, and overturning moment. The Z-direction was found to be more critical due to higher drift and deformation. The irregular L-shaped configuration significantly influenced the seismic response because of non-uniform mass and stiffness distribution. Overall, the study confirms that both RSA and THA should be considered for reliable seismic evaluation of irregular steel buildings, with special attention to controlling excessive storey drift.
1.Md. Foisal Haque a,* , Md. Mahmodul Hasan Rahat b , Md. Mozammel Hoque “Seismic performance evaluation of multi-storied RC structures by nonlinear staticanalysis”Results in Engineering https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.104105 2.Kanchanmani Poudel “Multistoried and Multi Bay Steel Building Frame by using Seismic Design” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) eVolume: 11 Issue: 01 | Jan 2024. 3.Dimitrios S. Sophianopoulos and Maria I. Ntina “Investigation of the Seismic Performance of a Multi-Story, Multi-Bay Special Truss Moment Steel Frame with X-Diagonal Shape Memory Alloy Bars “Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(22), 10283; https://doi.org/10.3390/app142210283. 4.Apoorv Joshia *, Rahul Yadavb “Seismic Analysis and Comparison of RCC and Steel Framed Multi-story Structures” International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, Vol 4, no 8, pp 1815-1822, August 2023 5.Ayman Z. Abdulhameed*1, Mazin A. Ahmed1 and Abdulamir A. Karim1 “Enhancing Seismic Performance of Multi-story Steel Buildings Using Inner Mega Braced Frames” Misan Journal of Engineering Sciences Vol. 2, No. 2, December 2023Greta Agata Venneria , Giuseppe Giampaolo Di Girolamoa , Ivan Memmoa , Giuseppe Brandoa* , Gianfranco De Matteisb “Seismic performance of multi-storey steel frames with semi-rigid joints” ScienceDirect Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Structural Integrity 44 (2023) 291–298 6.Chetan Sanjeev Beldar, Prof Nikam PravinAnkushrao, Dr S.P.Ahirrao “SEISMIC DESIGN OF MULTISTORIED AND MULTI BAY STEEL BUILDING FRAME” International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) Volume: 09 Issue: 05 | May 2022 7.Zakiah Putri2 , and Zev Al Jauhari3 “Assessment of seismic responses toward multi-story buildings of steel special moment resisting frame by considering the setback irregularities” ICDMM 2021 E3S Web of Conferences 331, 05007 (2021) Mrs. Bharti M. Orse1 , Mrs. Kalyani A. Tambade2 , Mr. Vikas B. Sonawane3 , 8. Prof. Rohit R. Zanjad6 , Prof. Vishakha P. Padmawar7 “Seismic Analysis of Multi Storey Steel Building with Different Bracings Using ETABS Software” IJSART - Volume 4 Issue 4 – APRIL 2018 9.D. SIVA PRASAD REDDY1 , M. MUJAHID AHMED2 “Seismic Design of Multistoried and Multibay Steel Building Frame” IJSETR Vol.06,Issue.05 February-2017, Pages:0818-0822 10.I.Anusha* , U.Arun Kumar “ANALYSIS OF A STEEL BUILDING AGAINST EARTHQUAKE LOADS” NTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES & RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY December, 2016 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.192603 11.Besan Alagawani 1,* and Yousef Al-Qaryouti 2 “Evaluating Overall Ductility Factor of Steel Frames with Viscoelastic Bracing System” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review 9 (4) (2016) 128 – 137 12.Akash D. Mundaware*, Chaitanya M. Mahale**, Gunvant S Magar*** and Mahendra S Shelke**** “Seismic Behavior of RC Frame Building and Its Analysis with Improving Measures” International Journal of Advance Research and Innovation Vol. 4(2), Apr-Jun 2016, pp. 52-65 Doi: 10.51976/ijari.421609
Publication Date
8/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...